: Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] FILTER_VALIDATE_INT and +0/-0
So the question is only whether +0 or -0 (or
+0, etc.) should be accepted as integers by FILTER_VALIDATE_INT. I
think they should, because we also accept non-canonical inputs such as
+5, i.e., we always accept a sign. It's true that 0
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 20:04:35 +0100, hakre hanskren...@yahoo.de wrote:
- Ursprüngliche Message -
Von: Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt
So the question is only whether +0 or -0 (or
+0, etc.) should be accepted as integers by FILTER_VALIDATE_INT. I
think they should, because we also
...@divbyzero.net
Gesendet: 21:19 Freitag, 8.Februar 2013
Betreff: Re: AW: [PHP-DEV] FILTER_VALIDATE_INT and +0/-0
A special case still left is ±0. It is with the 'PLUS-MINUS
SIGN' (U+00B1).
By special case, I meant a deviation to the general rule on how the code
handles
the input. The code
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 22:09:22 +0100, hakre hanskren...@yahoo.de wrote:
- Ursprüngliche Message -
Von: Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt
A special case still left is ±0. It is with the 'PLUS-MINUS
SIGN' (U+00B1).
By special case, I meant a deviation to the general rule on how the
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, hakre wrote:
Von: Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt
So the question is only whether +0 or -0 (or
+0, etc.) should be accepted as integers by FILTER_VALIDATE_INT. I
think they should, because we also accept non-canonical inputs such as
+5, i.e., we always
The change to FILTER_VALIDATE_INT seems to be inconsistent.
First of all, take the following bug (https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54096)
where it says PHP defines -0 as an int.. Where does PHP define it? The
documentation says: An integer is a number of the set ℤ = {..., -2, -1, 0, 1,
2, ...}.
On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:14:50 +0100, Frank Liepert frank.liep...@gmx.de
wrote:
The change to FILTER_VALIDATE_INT seems to be inconsistent.
First of all, take the following bug
(https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54096) where it says PHP defines -0 as
an int.. Where does PHP define it? The
Hi,
On Feb 4, 2013 12:33 PM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
So the question is only whether +0 or -0 (or +0, etc.) should be
accepted as integers by FILTER_VALIDATE_INT. I think they should, because
we also accept non-canonical inputs such as +5, i.e., we always accept a
sign. It's
So the question is only whether +0 or -0 (or +0, etc.) should be
accepted as integers by FILTER_VALIDATE_INT. I think they should,
because
we also accept non-canonical inputs such as +5, i.e., we always
accept a
sign. It's true that 0 is neither positive or negative, but I don't
think
Both statements are wrong, since the purpose of the filter extension
is to validate strings. I found this information in BR #52884 (see
last comment). Maybe it should be added to the docs? It's nonsense to
say, that FILTER_VALIDATE_INT must work like var_dump() since they
are both serving
10 matches
Mail list logo
