On 8/20/2017 1:56 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> On 20 August 2017 at 11:45, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>> On 5/24/2017 2:28 AM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>>
>> I would like to start the voting phase the next days, but leave a little
>> time for further feedback before doing so.
>
>
>
On 20 August 2017 at 11:45, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 5/24/2017 2:28 AM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
>
> I would like to start the voting phase the next days, but leave a little
> time for further feedback before doing so.
Perhaps it was clear in your head, but in the context of
On 5/24/2017 2:28 AM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> Hey internals!
>
> I haven't written the RFC yet, but the implementation is already done. I
> think that this is enough to start the discussion, since the concept of
> UUIDs should be well known to most people.
>
>
On 26 May 2017 10:30 a.m., "Nikita Popov" wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> Hey Nikita,
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Nikita Popov
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Fleshgrinder
On 5/26/2017 11:00 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> To clarify, I certainly do *not* want the behavior that was implemented
> here. The correct way (in your specific case) to handle this if by using
>
> if (zend_parse_parameters_throw(ZEND_NUM_ARGS(), "") == FAILURE) {
> return;
> }
>
> or adding a
On 5/26/2017 10:30 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Especially if it would allow us to replace a 4kloc diff with one 10loc
> function.
>
> Nikita
>
I could remove the provided C API for other modules. Would make the
header file empty and the implementation much shorter. Or at least
remove those that
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 5/26/2017 1:08 AM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> > Saw the discussion on github, and I wish that the argument parsing just
> > behaved like a *NORMAL* PHP method.
> >
> > The following is perfectly valid:
> >
> >
On 5/26/2017 1:08 AM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> Saw the discussion on github, and I wish that the argument parsing just
> behaved like a *NORMAL* PHP method.
>
> The following is perfectly valid:
>
> $crapTonOfUuids = array_map([UUID::class, 'v4'], range(0, 1000));
>
> This would raise a lot of
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> Hey Nikita,
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Nikita Popov
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Fleshgrinder
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/24/2017 10:12 PM, Ben
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 5/25/2017 4:45 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> > RFC is finished
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/uuid
> >
>
> Would it be possible that we discuss the open issues, instead of trying
> to get rid of the proposal
Am 25.05.2017 um 19:50 schrieb Levi Morrison:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/uuid#namespace
This is more a general thing. I know from many online conversations,
meetups, and conferences that people would love to see it.
My $0.02 is basically what Nikita Popov has said at some point in the past:
On 5/25/2017 7:50 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/uuid#namespace
>>
>> This is more a general thing. I know from many online conversations,
>> meetups, and conferences that people would love to see it.
>
> My $0.02 is basically what Nikita Popov has said at some point in the
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/uuid#namespace
>
> This is more a general thing. I know from many online conversations,
> meetups, and conferences that people would love to see it.
My $0.02 is basically what Nikita Popov has said at some point in the past:
The PHP namespace should be reserved for
On 5/25/2017 4:45 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> RFC is finished
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/uuid
>
Would it be possible that we discuss the open issues, instead of trying
to get rid of the proposal completely? I will not back up anyways after
investing so much time. ;)
Hey Nikita,
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Fleshgrinder
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/24/2017 10:12 PM, Ben Ramsey wrote:
>> > I'll take a look at the patch soon. If this is accepted to the core,
>> >
RFC is finished
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/uuid
--
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 5/25/2017 12:34 PM, Michał Brzuchalski wrote:
> 2017-05-25 12:14 GMT+02:00 Nikita Popov :
>> I'm wondering if just adding a uuid_v4_create() function (directly
>> returning a UUID string) might not cover the 95% use case here. My general
>> impression is that that's what
On 5/25/2017 1:01 AM, Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Larry Garfield
> wrote:
>> It doesn't have to be a PECL library. I agree that a project requiring a
>> PECL library greatly limits its potential reach, but with Composer
>> user-space libraries
2017-05-25 12:14 GMT+02:00 Nikita Popov :
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Fleshgrinder
> wrote:
>
> > On 5/24/2017 10:12 PM, Ben Ramsey wrote:
> > > I'll take a look at the patch soon. If this is accepted to the core,
> > > I'll probably add an
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 5/24/2017 10:12 PM, Ben Ramsey wrote:
> > I'll take a look at the patch soon. If this is accepted to the core,
> > I'll probably add an adapter to ramsey/uuid that wraps this
> > implementation. The point of the
On 5/24/2017 10:12 PM, Ben Ramsey wrote:
> I'll take a look at the patch soon. If this is accepted to the core,
> I'll probably add an adapter to ramsey/uuid that wraps this
> implementation. The point of the "over engineering" there is to provide
> choice. Some users want to generate bytes from
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> It doesn't have to be a PECL library. I agree that a project requiring a
> PECL library greatly limits its potential reach, but with Composer
> user-space libraries are totally easy to install. There's a nice and
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> >
> > Furthermore, I carefully crafted everything to be as close to userland
> > as possible. No magic, none at all. I use default PHP
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 5/24/2017 8:09 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> > For once, I must say that I disagree with having an OOP API defined in
> core.
> > This can exist in userland, so it probably should. Internal classes,
> their
> >
On 5/24/2017 8:09 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> For once, I must say that I disagree with having an OOP API defined in core.
> This can exist in userland, so it probably should. Internal classes, their
> reflection, behavior, inheritance model, etc are full of quirks.
> There's nothing wrong in
"Christoph M. Becker" in php.internals (Wed, 24 May 2017 18:35:08
+0200):
>On 24.05.2017 at 18:25, Remi Collet wrote:
>
>> And I also think using system libuuid is better than reinventing the
>> wheel, and having to maintain a uuid algo, when already maintained by
>> someone else, which only work
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 5/24/2017 5:11 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Larry Garfield
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It doesn't have to be a PECL library. I agree that a project requiring
> a
>
On 5/24/2017 5:11 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Larry Garfield
> wrote:
>
>> It doesn't have to be a PECL library. I agree that a project requiring a
>> PECL library greatly limits its potential reach, but with Composer
>> user-space
Am 24.05.2017 um 18:35 schrieb Christoph M. Becker:
On 24.05.2017 at 18:25, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 24/05/2017 à 17:57, Levi Morrison a écrit :
I understand the user experience improvement for having a package for UUIDs
in core; I'd like that myself. I just want to know why we haven't
Am 24.05.2017 um 18:30 schrieb Remi Collet:
Le 24/05/2017 à 17:21, li...@rhsoft.net a écrit :
frankly get out of my sight with composer
i maintain the whole webstacke for many years at my own (rpm packages)
and so the Fedora repos have excluded anything relevant to PHP - trying
to build
On 24.05.2017 at 18:25, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 24/05/2017 à 17:57, Levi Morrison a écrit :
>
>> I understand the user experience improvement for having a package for UUIDs
>> in core; I'd like that myself. I just want to know why we haven't discussed
>> the existing UUID package and made a new
Le 24/05/2017 à 17:21, li...@rhsoft.net a écrit :
> frankly get out of my sight with composer
>
> i maintain the whole webstacke for many years at my own (rpm packages)
> and so the Fedora repos have excluded anything relevant to PHP - trying
> to build composer by just download the src.rpm ends
Le 24/05/2017 à 17:57, Levi Morrison a écrit :
> I understand the user experience improvement for having a package for UUIDs
> in core; I'd like that myself. I just want to know why we haven't discussed
> the existing UUID package and made a new one.
I agree here, why a new extension ?
And I
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:29 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.05.2017 um 17:11 schrieb Levi Morrison:
>
>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Larry Garfield
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/24/2017 04:31 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>>>
Am 24.05.2017
Am 24.05.2017 um 17:11 schrieb Levi Morrison:
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Larry Garfield
wrote:
On 05/24/2017 04:31 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 24.05.2017 um 11:27 schrieb Dan Ackroyd:
Hey internals!
I haven't written the RFC yet,
Please don't forget
Am 24.05.2017 um 17:04 schrieb Larry Garfield:
On 05/24/2017 04:31 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 24.05.2017 um 11:27 schrieb Dan Ackroyd:
Hey internals!
I haven't written the RFC yet,
Please don't forget to include in the RFC a justification for why this
should be part of PHP core,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Larry Garfield
wrote:
> On 05/24/2017 04:31 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 24.05.2017 um 11:27 schrieb Dan Ackroyd:
>>
>>> Hey internals!
I haven't written the RFC yet,
>>>
>>> Please don't forget to include in
On 05/24/2017 04:31 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 24.05.2017 um 11:27 schrieb Dan Ackroyd:
Hey internals!
I haven't written the RFC yet,
Please don't forget to include in the RFC a justification for why this
should be part of PHP core, rather than a library
because as developer in
Am 24.05.2017 um 11:27 schrieb Dan Ackroyd:
Hey internals!
I haven't written the RFC yet,
Please don't forget to include in the RFC a justification for why this
should be part of PHP core, rather than a library
because as developer in reality you can not use and rely on features
which
> Hey internals!
>
> I haven't written the RFC yet,
Please don't forget to include in the RFC a justification for why this
should be part of PHP core, rather than a library.
cheers
Dan
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
40 matches
Mail list logo