Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-26 Thread Julien Pauli
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Joe Watkins wrote: > Hi Anatol, > > Sounds good to me. > > Cheers > Joe Nice, we are moving forward ! Anyway, Anatol and I are here to help with the tasks. The job is mainly about reviewing code, and above all : organize people and human

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-24 Thread Joe Watkins
> To: Davey Shafik <da...@php.net> > > Cc: Anatol Belski <anatol@belski.net>; Julien Pauli <jpa...@php.net>; > Scott > > Arciszewski <sc...@paragonie.com>; Anatol Belski <a...@php.net>; PHP > > internals <internals@lists.php.net>; Ferenc Ko

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-24 Thread Anatol Belski
ki <sc...@paragonie.com>; Anatol Belski <a...@php.net>; PHP > internals <internals@lists.php.net>; Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com>; > Stanislav Malyshev <s...@php.net> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap > > > I'm honestly not 100% sure what all is

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-24 Thread Pierre Joye
ternals@lists.php.net>; Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com >> >; >> > Stanislav Malyshev <s...@php.net> >> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap >> > >> > I'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also? >> > &

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-23 Thread Joe Watkins
;sc...@paragonie.com>; Anatol Belski <a...@php.net > >; > > > PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>; Ferenc Kovacs < > tyr...@gmail.com > > >; > > > Stanislav Malyshev <s...@php.net> > > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap >

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-23 Thread Davey Shafik
> > To: Julien Pauli <jpa...@php.net> > > Cc: Scott Arciszewski <sc...@paragonie.com>; Anatol Belski <a...@php.net>; > > PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>; Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com > >; > > Stanislav Malyshev <s...@php.net> >

RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-23 Thread Anatol Belski
lt;a...@php.net>; > PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>; Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com>; > Stanislav Malyshev <s...@php.net> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap > > I'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also? > > - Davey &g

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-22 Thread Pierre Joye
On Apr 22, 2016 8:42 PM, "Ferenc Kovacs" wrote: > > co-RM can simply mean "one of the two RMs", and emphasize that somebody > would volunteer to take the role but not being comfortable to doing it > alone so I think we are on the same page. Exactly. And I am convinced Davey and

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-22 Thread Ferenc Kovacs
co-RM can simply mean "one of the two RMs", and emphasize that somebody would volunteer to take the role but not being comfortable to doing it alone so I think we are on the same page. On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Julien Pauli wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Davey

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-22 Thread Julien Pauli
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Davey Shafik wrote: > I'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also? Hi. The Co-RM is the version-1 RM, so it will be Anatol, RM of 7.0. We are looking for a "master" RM here :-) Julien.Pauli -- PHP Internals - PHP

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-21 Thread Davey Shafik
I'd interested in co-RMing 7.1 if someone else wants to step up also? - Davey On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Julien Pauli wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Scott Arciszewski > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Anatol Belski

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-21 Thread Julien Pauli
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Scott Arciszewski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Anatol Belski wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Time goes by fast - no sooner 7.0 was unleashed on the world than 7.1 >> bangs >> at the door. I would like to bring a couple of

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 7.1 roadmap

2016-04-12 Thread Scott Arciszewski
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Anatol Belski wrote: > Hi, > > Time goes by fast - no sooner 7.0 was unleashed on the world than 7.1 bangs > at the door. I would like to bring a couple of points regarding this. > > There is enough time yet, but it would make full sense all the