On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:37 PM wrote:
>
> The overloaded concat operator has higher priority than the __toString()
> method.
> So if Class A overloades the concat operator, then calling $a . $b means
> ClassA::__concat($a, $b); (Note that both operands are passed in their
> original form)
>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:02 PM David Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> With all respect, seems a bit confuses to me, without in fact offer a new
> feature, just a shortcut. I hope it's me seeing it the wrong way.
>
> What happen if I rename the constructor parameters on a child class
> constructor?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:52 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> This has been declined in the past, but I just keep making this mistake,
> and believe it deserves reconsideration...
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/trailing_comma_in_parameter_list
>
> Nikita
>
This would be a great
pon., 23 mar 2020 o 18:58 napisał(a):
> Hi internals,
>
> I have opened voting on
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/userspace_operator_overloading, which allows
> users
> to overload operators in their own classes.
>
I got two comments, a little late but always better than even later.
The first thing
Am 26.03.2020 um 14:30 schrieb Nikita Popov:
I would like to submit the following RFC for your consideration:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor_promotion
Looks good to me! Thanks.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thursday, March 26, 2020 3:50 AM Jakob Givoni wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 6:28 AM Christoph M. Becker wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that the RFC is not sufficiently specific enough
>> regarding the concatenation of instances of classes which implement
>> __toString().
>
> Exactly what I
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 8:31 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> I would like to submit the following RFC for your consideration:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor_promotion
>
> This is based on one off the suggestions made in
> https://externals.io/message/109220, and some existing discussion on the
> On Mar 26, 2020, at 08:30, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> Hi internals,
>
> I would like to submit the following RFC for your consideration:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor_promotion
>
> This is based on one off the suggestions made in
> https://externals.io/message/109220, and some existing
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020, jan.h.boeh...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > I have opened voting on
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/userspace_operator_overloading, which allows users
> > to overload operators in their own classes.
>
> I've always been a strong proponent of
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:33 AM Paul M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 26, 2020, at 08:30, Nikita Popov wrote:
> >
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > I would like to submit the following RFC for your consideration:
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor_promotion
>
> Big fan. Thanks for this.
>
>
I like
Hi internals
Looking through the language grammer I discovered that switch cases can also be
terminated with a `;` instead of a `:`.
```
switch ($i) {
case 1;
return 1;
default;
return 2;
}
```
https://3v4l.org/o7nD8
This is in fact documented:
Hi internals,
This has been declined in the past, but I just keep making this mistake,
and believe it deserves reconsideration...
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/trailing_comma_in_parameter_list
Nikita
Hello!
With all respect, seems a bit confuses to me, without in fact offer a new
feature, just a shortcut. I hope it's me seeing it the wrong way.
What happen if I rename the constructor parameters on a child class
constructor?
Example (https://3v4l.org/VqQde):
class A {
public function
czw., 26 mar 2020 o 14:31 Nikita Popov napisał(a):
> Hi internals,
>
> I would like to submit the following RFC for your consideration:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor_promotion
>
> This is based on one off the suggestions made in
> https://externals.io/message/109220, and some existing
On 26.03.2020 at 18:18, Guilliam Xavier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:37 PM wrote:
>>
>> The overloaded concat operator has higher priority than the __toString()
>> method.
>> So if Class A overloades the concat operator, then calling $a . $b means
>> ClassA::__concat($a, $b); (Note that
On Thursday, March 26, 2020 6:19 PM Guilliam Xavier
wrote:
>> If the concat operator is not overloaded, the behavior is like now, and the
>> objects are converted implicitly to strings (so $a . $b actually means
>> (string) $a . (string) $b).
>> Furthermore an notice is triggered, hinting the
> Le 26 mars 2020 à 21:49, Benoit SCHILDKNECHT a écrit :
>
> A semi-colon is terminal. Italways is. "You see this set of instructions?
> Done.". But in this case, itis not. You see the problem?
>
No I don’t see the problem. Inside a switch construct, when you reach the end
of an
Hi,
To justify my "no" vote. I agree that it would be nice if PHP would provide
these objects out of the box, but there are some inconsistencies in the
object properties that made me oppose this. For instance, not all headers
are treated equally, while some become properties of the request
Hi!
> Maybe something to deprecate in PHP 8.0.
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_0
Why? Whose life it'd make easier?
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@gmail.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
$handle = fopen('test.csv', 'r');
while (($data = fgetcsv($handle)) !== false) {
[int $id, string $data, int $year] = $data;
// do something with the correctly typed variables
}
The code would trigger a fatal error when strict_types are enabled. With
strict_types disabled it would
I agree with Tovilo. It is weird and confusing. Actually I never know that
it was possible. And the ";" sounds like "it ends here", while ":" counds
like "it does it ->". For me, "case 1;" will sounds like "skip case 1".
Atenciosamente,
David Rodrigues
Em qui., 26 de mar. de 2020 às 17:14,
> On Mar 26, 2020, at 13:52, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> Hi internals,
>
> This has been declined in the past, but I just keep making this mistake,
> and believe it deserves reconsideration...
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/trailing_comma_in_parameter_list
>
> Nikita
Yes, please
Cheers,
Ben
Hi!
On 3/26/20 1:26 PM, David Rodrigues wrote:
> I agree with Tovilo. It is weird and confusing. Actually I never know
> that it was possible.
You seem to contradict yourself - if you never knew it was possible, how
could you ever be confused by it?
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@gmail.com
--
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020, jan.h.boeh...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I have opened voting on
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/userspace_operator_overloading, which allows users
> to overload operators in their own classes.
I've always been a strong proponent of operator overloading, but as PHP
Hi Ilija,
Ilija Tovilo wrote:
Looking through the language grammer I discovered that switch cases can also be
terminated with a `;` instead of a `:`.
```
switch ($i) {
case 1;
return 1;
default;
return 2;
}
```
https://3v4l.org/o7nD8
This is in fact documented:
> Le 26 mars 2020 à 19:37, Ilija Tovilo a écrit :
>
> What's the reasoning behind this? I find it weird an inconsistent.
>
This is a manifestly a leftover of an old syntax. Take a look at the PHP/FI 2
manual:
Language constructs:
https://www.php.net/manual/phpfi2.php#lang
On 26.03.2020 at 23:04, Claude Pache wrote:
>> Le 26 mars 2020 à 19:37, Ilija Tovilo a écrit :
>>
>> What's the reasoning behind this? I find it weird an inconsistent.
>
> This is a manifestly a leftover of an old syntax. Take a look at the PHP/FI 2
> manual:
>
> Language constructs:
>
Am 24.03.2020 um 11:06 schrieb Sebastian Bergmann:
I voted "no" for the same reason.
I changed my vote to "yes" because of Nikita's arguments.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi!
> Actually it is a simplest case, where only a single information was
> considered. But you can expand it to something more complex, where
> currently you will need create a static method to copy the data, which
> is not a normalized way like cast could do.
You can always use anonymous
Hey there!
I'm thrilled since this is my first proposal.
I'd like to propose a new visibility schema for classes, based on a explicit
group of namespaces allowed to use the class.
The goal of this proposal is to provide a way to cover from a native
language feature what currently is usually
Hi!
> I would like to submit the following RFC for your consideration:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor_promotion
I like this shortcut. I am not sure though I understand why callable is
not allowed? Can't it just create a non-typed property?
--
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@gmail.com
--
PHP
On 26/03/2020 23:47, Javier Spagnoletti wrote:
Hey there!
I'm thrilled since this is my first proposal.
This idea has been discussed a great many times over the years, and has
generally always been rejected during discussion as something that does
not add value to the language.
If
I accept that it adds an extra level of understanding to the language – if
you see
function addAmounts($a, $b) { return $a + $b; }
you no longer definitely know the answer will be numeric.
However, I imagine that the sorts of people who will use this are _also_
the sorts of people who would add
Le Thu, 26 Mar 2020 21:28:38 +0100, Stanislav Malyshev
a écrit:
Hi!
On 3/26/20 1:26 PM, David Rodrigues wrote:
I agree with Tovilo. It is weird and confusing. Actually I never know
that it was possible.
You seem to contradict yourself - if you never knew it was possible, how
could you ever
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020, at 1:52 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> This has been declined in the past, but I just keep making this mistake,
> and believe it deserves reconsideration...
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/trailing_comma_in_parameter_list
>
> Nikita
Endorse.
I don't think
> Le 26 mars 2020 à 03:08, Vasilii Shpilchin a
> écrit :
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> PHP also can include from URL. In this case it makes sense to produce warning
> and do not break execution.
>
I don’t think that it makes sense to include from URL, to begin with.
IIRC, the
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 9:54 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:36 AM wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Hope everyone is doing alright. I just raised a new RFC
> > (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_str_starts_with_and_ends_with_functions ,
> > github patch:
Hi Lynn,
Thank you very much for the input! Then we could add a secondary vote to
the RFC where an
upgrade path was decided upon.
The first such path is the one proposed by Christoph:
Introduce a temporary ini setting with which a "debug" mode of float to
string casting could be
enabled. That
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:36 AM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hope everyone is doing alright. I just raised a new RFC
> (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_str_starts_with_and_ends_with_functions ,
> github patch: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/5300) for adding
> str_starts_with and str_ends_with to PHP. I
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 5:17 PM Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi everybody! I hope you’re doing well.
>
>
>
> Due to the modest feedback I’d like to move the throw expression RFC to
> “under discussion”.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/throw_expression
>
>
>
> In short, the RFC proposes to convert the
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:11 AM Levi Morrison via internals <
internals@lists.php.net> wrote:
> It's bothered me for quite some time that a failed include emits a
> warning. This is because it's by design that the author chose
> `include` and not `require`. It's _expected_ that it may fail and
Hello there,
I'd like to throw my name in the selection os RM for PHP 8 :)
I've been contributing to PHP itself for a while, apart from many other
contributions in the ecosystem.
Best regards,
On 22.03.20, 18:17, "Dan Ackroyd" wrote:
> $condition || throw new Exception('$condition must be truthy')
> && $condition2 || throw new Exception('$condition2 must be truthy');
>
> The "Deprecate left-associative ternary operator"* RFC made it so that
> parentheses are required when ternary
Hi again,
Just a reminder that if you're interested in being one of the PHP 8.0
release managers, then now is the time to step forwards. I'll be
starting the selection procedure next week.
cheers,
Derick
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Derick Rethans wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> With the first alpha of 8.0
Hi,
I think it might be worth to discuss if we want to go for PHP 8.0 at this
time. I'd think that lots of businesses will prefer stability over new
features and resolving BC breaks in the coming months. Also life of many
devs might get impacted. I'm thinking that it would be good to at least
> On Mar 26, 2020, at 08:30, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> Hi internals,
>
> I would like to submit the following RFC for your consideration:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor_promotion
Big fan. Thanks for this.
--
Paul M. Jones
pmjo...@pmjones.io
http://paul-m-jones.com
Modernizing
Hi Levi,
Am 25.03.2020 um 21:44 schrieb Levi Morrison:
To me, this is almost a good idea. However, I would want regular type
checking, not casts. Importantly, regular type checks would fit well
on allowing array destructuring directly in function signatures, which
would basically be a form of
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 12:39, Enno Woortmann wrote:
>
> $handle = fopen('test.csv', 'r');
> while (($data = fgetcsv($handle)) !== false) {
> [int $id, string $data, int $year] = $data;
> // do something with the correctly typed variables
> }
>
> The code would trigger a fatal error
Hi internals,
I would like to submit the following RFC for your consideration:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor_promotion
This is based on one off the suggestions made in
https://externals.io/message/109220, and some existing discussion on the
topic can be found in that thread.
The primary
49 matches
Mail list logo
