Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
When it comes to voting I think it should not be democratic but
meritocratic.
whereas we now are mostly do-o-cratic (a nice term that came up
at EuroFoo although i don't remember where i picked it up ...)
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Sterling Hughes wrote:
That's wrong. You should *never* require an E_WARNING to be sent
without being able to silence it, especially not on something so
unimportant.
It's just as wrong as trying to
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
At last weekend's EuroFoo [1] I attended Marc-Andre Lemburg's talk [2]
on the Python development process.
I really wish we had a process similar to Python's PEPs [3] [4] for
PHP.
Having guidelines for issues like adding a new module [5] or
On 27.8.2004 8:59 Uhr, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
At last weekend's EuroFoo [1] I attended Marc-Andre Lemburg's talk [2]
on the Python development process.
I really wish we had a process similar to Python's PEPs [3] [4] for
PHP.
Having guidelines for
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
whereas we now are mostly do-o-cratic (a nice term that came up
at EuroFoo although i don't remember where i picked it up ...)
Which is just colloquial for meritocratic, AFAICS :-)
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
Derick Rethans wrote:
What is wrong with how we currently do it?
We have currently nothing like it. Or if we do, I haven't notices it in
the last couple of years. And if I haven't, chances are that our users
haven't either :-)
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
whereas we now are mostly do-o-cratic (a nice term that came up
at EuroFoo although i don't remember where i picked it up ...)
Which is just colloquial for meritocratic, AFAICS :-)
No, as your vote doesn't get more important in general as you
ext/soap pumped up the minimal requirement. It uses xmlBufferCreateStatic which
is not found in the 2.5.x libxml2 . I upgraded to 2.6.7 and this helped. Probably
when --disable-soap is used one can use 2.5.10+ . For me
libxml2-2.5.10-29.i586.rpm (suse 9.0) didn't work.
andrey
George Schlossnagle
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
No, as your vote doesn't get more important in general as you
contribute. Instead you vote for a certain way of doing something
and the most effective way of voting against this is to implement
a different approach. (as far as i understood)
Hm, I always thought that the
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I would like to get some feedback about my suggestion to move away from the
simple 'experimental' status and dividing it into two - quality rating, and
'API subject to change' tagging. Does this make sense to anybody else?
yes, sounds much better than
Christian Stocker wrote:
Actually, other people i talk to are always impressed, how this
chaotic, based-on-common-agreement developement process actually works
at all ;)
Well, one reason might be no matter how fuzzy the process
there are some very clear metrics for the result, like
e.g.
On 27.8.2004 9:31 Uhr, Andrey Hristov wrote:
ext/soap pumped up the minimal requirement. It uses
xmlBufferCreateStatic which
is not found in the 2.5.x libxml2 . I upgraded to 2.6.7 and this helped.
Probably
when --disable-soap is used one can use 2.5.10+ . For me
libxml2-2.5.10-29.i586.rpm
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Christian Stocker wrote:
Actually, other people i talk to are always impressed, how this
chaotic, based-on-common-agreement developement process actually works
at all ;)
Well, one reason might be no matter how fuzzy the process
there are
On 27.8.2004 9:58 Uhr, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Christian Stocker wrote:
Actually, other people i talk to are always impressed, how this
chaotic, based-on-common-agreement developement process actually
works at all ;)
Well, one reason might be no matter how fuzzy the process
there are some
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 09:11:58 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
What is wrong with how we currently do it?
We have currently nothing like it. Or if we do, I haven't notices it in
the last couple of years. And if I haven't, chances are that our users
ok, needs clearance. 2.5.10 didn't work for me when SOAP support
was enabled. I didn't try compiling without it since I just needed this
extension compiled (usually I leave it out as well as the XML stuff).
Andrey
Christian Stocker wrote:
On 27.8.2004 9:31 Uhr, Andrey Hristov wrote:
ext/soap
Hi,
I have an hopefully simple question;
imagine the following statement:
obj = (struct obj_struct *) zend_object_store_get_object(zval TSRMLS_CC);
Ok, now I'm in a situation where I'd need the other way
round, i.e. a way to fetch the zval of the obj I've got
(i.e. I have obj and need zval).
isn't the situation that several zvals can reference one object?
Andrey
Michael Wallner wrote:
Hi,
I have an hopefully simple question;
imagine the following statement:
obj = (struct obj_struct *) zend_object_store_get_object(zval TSRMLS_CC);
Ok, now I'm in a situation where I'd need the other way
That would be fine to not allow the problem extensions to run under ze1 and
end up issuing zend_error(E_ERROR, Trying to clone an uncloneable object of
class %s, Z_OBJCE_P(value)-name) (which currently happens when no clone
handler is implimented).
In order for that to happen though the
Hey,
I was messing around with array_walk[_recursive] and found the behaviour it
uses to validate callback functions completely different to other standard
functions.
array_walk_recursive
http://lxr.php.net/source/php-src/ext/standard/array.c#
array_filter
Hi Andrey Hristov, you wrote:
isn't the situation that several zvals can reference one object?
Should this be read as No way, sorry? :)
Regards,
--
Michael - mike(@)php.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
The engine gurus have the final word :)
Andrey
Michael Wallner wrote:
Hi Andrey Hristov, you wrote:
isn't the situation that several zvals can reference one object?
Should this be read as No way, sorry? :)
Regards,
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
The DVAL_TO_LVAL macro is quite weird, I'm not sure exactly what it's
supposed to be doing but it probably isn't doing it. If the integral
part of d is outside the range of a long, the conversion has undefined
behaviour by the C99 standard; an explicit cast makes no difference
AFAICT.
GCC on IA64
On August 27, 2004 03:26 am, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Me too.
I would like to get some feedback about my suggestion to move away from the
simple 'experimental' status and dividing it into two - quality rating, and
'API subject to change' tagging. Does this make sense to anybody else?
As long as
Hello Zeev,
Makes sense to me.
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, August 27, 2004, 3:26:25 AM, you wrote:
ZS I would like to get some feedback about my suggestion to move away from the
ZS simple 'experimental' status and dividing it into two
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
I would like to get some feedback about my suggestion to move away from the
simple 'experimental' status and dividing it into two - quality rating, and
'API subject to change' tagging. Does this make sense to anybody
Derick Rethans wrote:
Aren't PECL package version numbers already providing this?
But not everything is in PECL :)
any bundled extensions that are still EXPERIMENTAL should
move to PECL anyway IMHO
--
Hartmut Holzgraefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
On August 27, 2004 11:31 am, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
Aren't PECL package version numbers already providing this?
But not everything is in PECL :)
any bundled extensions that are still EXPERIMENTAL should
move to PECL anyway IMHO
+1
Ilia
--
PHP Internals - PHP
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Michael Wallner wrote:
Hi,
I have an hopefully simple question;
imagine the following statement:
obj = (struct obj_struct *) zend_object_store_get_object(zval TSRMLS_CC);
Ok, now I'm in a situation where I'd need the other way
round, i.e. a way to fetch the zval
[Oops. Send this email directly to Rasmus rather than the list...]
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 12:58:21PM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
2. web app sends it to internals@ or some other relevant list
3. Replies to that email automatically get picked up by the web app
4. Alternatively, you can
Hi Andrei Zmievski, you wrote:
The main question is: why do you need to do it?
Exercise ;)
I'll try to explain after having dinner...
Thanks,
--
Michael - mike(@)php.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
There doesn't exist such a thing as the object's zval. An object can have
many zval's. The zval includes the object's id and handlers that manage the
object's behavior. You can just create a new zval by using MAKE_STD_ZVAL()
and setting the relevant fields.
If you get stuck let me know.
Andi
At 05:54 AM 8/27/2004 -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
That would be fine to not allow the problem extensions to run under ze1 and
end up issuing zend_error(E_ERROR, Trying to clone an uncloneable object of
class %s, Z_OBJCE_P(value)-name) (which currently happens when no clone
handler is implimented).
Hi Andi Gutmans, you wrote:
You can just create a new zval by using
MAKE_STD_ZVAL() and setting the relevant fields.
Fair enough; I was searching for kinda ZVAL_OBJ[ECT]()
macro at second, without success...
If you get stuck let me know.
A tiny piece of code would help a lot :)
I can't
I hadn't even thought about that but it should give the desired results.
Can the error message be modified slightly to indicate that it is running
under ze1 compat in zend_execute.c?
Right now it just says: Trying to clone an uncloneable object of class %s,
which is fine in most cases, but at
At 01:56 PM 8/27/2004 -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
I hadn't even thought about that but it should give the desired results.
Can the error message be modified slightly to indicate that it is running
under ze1 compat in zend_execute.c?
Right now it just says: Trying to clone an uncloneable object of
At 18:33 27/08/2004, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On August 27, 2004 11:31 am, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
Aren't PECL package version numbers already providing this?
But not everything is in PECL :)
any bundled extensions that are still EXPERIMENTAL should
move to PECL
Hi everyone,
While playing with Ldap, Squirrelmail and an Active Directory server I
ran into a limitation of the PHP ldap_modify function.
In general, an (non-PHP) ldap_modify will allow you to add, replace and
delete several attributes for a DN in one single transaction. The PHP
Ldap
Hi,
I'm trying to find status on the multibyte support in PHP. The manual
shows the functions in mbstring to be experimental and it's hard to find
evidence of how stable it really is.
Is this natively supported in PHP after 4.3.x?
Thanks,
Al
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
This patches fixes a simple error in the dbareader.inc files.
Enjoy
--
Math
aka ROunofF
==
argontechnologies.ca
Index: dbareader.inc
===
RCS file: /repository/php-src/ext/spl/examples/dbareader.inc,v
retrieving revision 1.3
Hello Mathieu,
thanks for the fix.
Friday, August 27, 2004, 10:33:31 PM, you wrote:
This patches fixes a simple error in the dbareader.inc files.
Enjoy
--
Math
aka ROunofF
[...]
-?
\ No newline at end of file
+?
btw: The missing new line is intentional.
best regards
marcus
Hi,
On 2004/08/28, at 5:15, Al Baker wrote:
I'm trying to find status on the multibyte support in PHP. The manual
shows the functions in mbstring to be experimental and it's hard to
find
evidence of how stable it really is.
Which manual says that mbstring is still experimental? :) it was marked
On 27.8.2004 20:23 Uhr, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 18:33 27/08/2004, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On August 27, 2004 11:31 am, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
Aren't PECL package version numbers already providing this?
But not everything is in PECL :)
any bundled extensions that
Thanks for the confirmation. The experimental warning appears on any of
the individual help files for mbstring (e.g. mb_ereg).
Do you know if the regular expression support lets you match alpha and
numeric content like you would normally?
Al
On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 05:52 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi
44 matches
Mail list logo
