Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] PHP Attributes

On 05/10/2016 03:48 PM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote: On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: Hi internals, I've started voting on "PHP Attributes" RFC. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes In my opinion, "PHP Attributes" might be a smart tool for PHP extension,

Re: [PHP-DEV] Assess acceptability of having php-ds into core

On 05/12/2016 08:27 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote: Hi internals, PHP 7 leverages a lot the performance internally and many PHP applications in the wild. Much of these improvement came by experimentation through PHPNG and the usage of efficient data structures internally. This idea of

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Pipe Operator

On 05/14/2016 07:42 PM, François Laupretre wrote: Le 13/05/2016 à 20:16, Sara Golemon a écrit : for a potential solution to such a long-time issue as argument ordering sadness, IMHO, it's worth the pain. I am currently doing it and I'll send you the list when it is ready. Awesome. Even if

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Closure from callable

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Nikita Nefedov wrote: > why would you need to support a $this->fieldName case though? > Because to not support it would be to deliberately design in a new flavor of inconsistency into the language. $obj->memb is a property access in PHP.

[PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Forbid dynamic calls to scope introspection functions

Hi internals, The RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/forbid_dynamic_scope_introspection is now in voting. The vote closes on 2016-05-24 with a required majority of 2/3. Nikita

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Closure from callable

> On 15 May 2016, at 20:29, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > > Hello, > > I've opened the voting for the Closure from callable RFC - > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closurefromcallable > > Just to note, some people I've spoken to have expressed a desire to > have a more powerful syntax

[PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Closure from callable

Hello, I've opened the voting for the Closure from callable RFC - https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closurefromcallable Just to note, some people I've spoken to have expressed a desire to have a more powerful syntax where 'bare' function names are used, like: callable(someFunctionName)

Re: [PHP-DEV] Functorial interfaces

2016-05-15 16:21 GMT+02:00 Rasmus Schultz : > > As a downside, you can't implement it in a normal class anymore and just > use > > an instance of that class. > > I see that as a plus, because, as a you said: > > > That's why you call it with the method name of the interface >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Functorial interfaces

> As a downside, you can't implement it in a normal class anymore and just use > an instance of that class. I see that as a plus, because, as a you said: > That's why you call it with the method name of the interface Your logic is circular - you also said: > As a downside, you can't implement

Re: [PHP-DEV] Functorial interfaces

2016-05-15 12:05 GMT+02:00 Rasmus Schultz : > I know you're already voting on this, but I'd like to throw in a > couple of late comments. > > My main problem with this RFC is the use of the interface keyword for > something that almost by definition is not an interface. > > An

Re: [PHP-DEV] Functorial interfaces

I know you're already voting on this, but I'd like to throw in a couple of late comments. My main problem with this RFC is the use of the interface keyword for something that almost by definition is not an interface. An interface is a set of methods, but an anonymous function is just one

[PHP-DEV] [RFC][Vote] Functional Interfaces

Morning internals, Functional interfaces has been moved to voting stage, please participate. http://wiki.php.net/rfc/functional-interfaces#vote Cheers Joe