Sorry for the so late reply, but I would like to continue the
discussion on this topic.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:04 PM G. P. B. wrote:
>> I didn't know that the strict types directive was a mistake. My intention is
>> to be able to write clean all-decimal units of code and not break the
>>
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 5:05 PM Saki Takamachi wrote:
> Hi Jordan,
>
> > Using a BCNum inside a loop is the use case, where every loop would
> result in memory allocation for a new object, as well as the overhead of
> the constructor, etc.
> >
> > Granted, only people who REALLY know what they
Hi Jordan,
> Using a BCNum inside a loop is the use case, where every loop would result in
> memory allocation for a new object, as well as the overhead of the
> constructor, etc.
>
> Granted, only people who REALLY know what they are doing should be doing
> this. Though my library which
Hi Rowan
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 3:41 PM Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]
wrote:
>
> The remaining difference I can see in the current RFC which seems to be
> unnecessary is that combining with set is only allowed on virtual
> properties. Although it may be "virtual" in the strict sense, any
> hook must
Hi,
I created a prototype, although it's pretty rough. It can overload operators
and calculate not only between `BcNum` but also between `BcNum` and `int` or
`string`.
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/13741
I compared the execution times.
Test code:
```
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 8:39 AM Saki Takamachi wrote:
> Hi Barney,
>
> Thanks, that's what I was starting to worry about too. It seems like a
> good idea to support only immutability, as you say earlier in your proposal.
>
> Regards.
>
> Saki
Using a BCNum inside a loop is the use case, where
Thank you Marc for your opinion. It makes sense to me that we should have
the possibility to mimic the IEEE-754 standard, thus we should have `fpow`
function as well. I have updated the RFC and would like to start the voting
if there are no new comments.
Kind regards,
Jorg Sowa
Hi,
IMHO, the more meaningful cases of the RFC are missing :
round(float, precision: >= 0): int|float // only cast to float for int overflow
ceil(float): int|float // only cast to float for int overflow
floor(float): int|float // only cast to float for int overflow
Calling ceil or floor on
On 11/03/2024 12:52, Gina P. Banyard wrote:
I would like to get some initial feedback on an RFC I've been working on for
the last 5–6 months.
The RFC attempts to explain, and most importantly, improve the semantics around
$container[$offset] as PHP is currently widely inconsistent.
[...]
On 17/03/2024 00:01, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
For clarity, you are asking for a way to make the "virtualness" of
properties more explicit, correct?
Either more explicit, or less important: the less often the user needs
to know whether a property is virtual, the less it matters how easily
they
On 17.3.2024 13:23:04, Marc Bennewitz wrote:
Hello internals,
I have opened the vote for the "Rounding Integers as int" RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/integer-rounding
Do to Easter weekend the vote will run for two weeks and two days
until Tue the 2nd of April 2024.
Best regards,
Marc
On 17.03.24 14:10, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi
On 3/17/24 13:23, Marc Bennewitz wrote:
I have opened the vote for the "Rounding Integers as int" RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/integer-rounding
Please also update the Status within the RFC itself and move it to the
correct section in the RFC
Hi
On 3/17/24 13:23, Marc Bennewitz wrote:
I have opened the vote for the "Rounding Integers as int" RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/integer-rounding
Please also update the Status within the RFC itself and move it to the
correct section in the RFC overview at: https://wiki.php.net/rfc
Best
Hello internals,
I have opened the vote for the "Rounding Integers as int" RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/integer-rounding
Do to Easter weekend the vote will run for two weeks and two days until Tue the
2nd of April 2024.
Best regards,
Marc Bennewitz
OpenPGP_0x3936ABF753BC88CE.asc
14 matches
Mail list logo
