Done; thanks for the ping!
cc'ing Nuno, our GCOV guy!
2017-07-18 21:32 GMT+02:00 Sara Golemon :
Looks like I don't have karma to add PHP_7_2 to gcov runs, could
someone do that for me? Thanks.
--
regards,
Kalle Sommer Nielsen
ka...@php.net
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Maili
Hi,
I've disabled the following extensions from the build of PHP_HEAD at the
gcov.php.net server:
- oci8
- pdo_oci
- sybase_ct
- litespeed SAPI
These extensions don't seem to have been upgraded to the new APIs.
Therefore I've disabled them so that we can test the other (majority)
extensions.
Yes, please!
Just make sure the old versions are blacklisted (anything older than the
first white-listed version).
Thanks,
Nuno
- Original Message -
Hi!
LTP's lcov 1.11 seems to work fine here.
Can we make this a blacklist instead of an annoying whitelist, too, just
like the bison c
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Michael Wallner wrote:
I also have a patch for run-tests sitting around for quite some time,
which
adds concurrent test execution support. I already fixed a lot of non
re-entrant tests in the past, but there might still be quite some of
them.
HHVM uses PHP's
A] Parallel run-tests
On 21/05/2012 06:45, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hi Zoe,
Thanks for undertaking this project!
I just have a few concerns about this:
- The speedup seems a bit low to me. Maybe with a higher number of
extensions enabled it will improve?..
I don't think it will improve with a higher
Alright, thanks for the reply!
I'll try to have a look at the code and give it a try next weekend.
Nuno
-Original Message-
From: zoe slattery
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-QA] Parallel run-tests
On 21/05/2012 06:45, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hi Zoe,
Thank
Hi Zoe,
Thanks for undertaking this project!
I just have a few concerns about this:
- The speedup seems a bit low to me. Maybe with a higher number of
extensions enabled it will improve?..
- Is there any developer documentation available? If I wanted to do a
change or a bug fix today, how cou
I have no clue what those 2 sections do either.
But if the number of affected tests is small, then feel free to patch the
tests and/or run-tests.php.
Nuno
-Original Message-
From: zoe slattery
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 2:06 PM
Subject: [PHP-QA] run-tests.php - GZIP_POST and DEFLAT
It's very important! Take a look at http://gcov.php.net
A single build takes almost 2 days with most extensions enabled plus
valgrind testing.
So, yes, parallel testing would be highly appreciated (but do not forget my
initial requirements, such as e.g. mysql and mysqli tests cannot run at the
Hi,
Thanks to Nexcess, we have a new wonderful machine for http://gcov.php.net
up and running.
This new machine is running linux 64 bits, so expect a few differences in
the test results.
I believe most things are ported from the old machine, including all
daemon's configurations.
I fired an
The gcov.php.net machine is about to die. Nexcess (the owner) already
offered us the possibility to get a replacement.
However, before accepting their offer I would like to know if someone is
still using the gcov.php.net service. Is it still useful for anyone?
I think test coverage, valgrind and
Hi,
The gcov.php.net machine is about to die. Nexcess (the owner) already
offered us the possibility to get a replacement.
However, before accepting their offer I would like to know if someone is
still using the gcov.php.net service. Is it still useful for anyone?
A new machine means installi
uch better than allocating a few extra pointers or calling
perealloc() a few times?), the fix for it isn't trivial, so I left it
alone. The updated patch is (again) posted at:
http://darkrainfall.org/php-5.3-shellbypass.patch
On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Hi,
So the p
Hi,
So the patch looks generally good. Here are some minor comments about it:
- I believe _php_array_to_argv() doesn't need TSRMLS_DC. If that's the
case, please remove it.
- in _php_array_to_argv() you modify the input array destructively (when
calling convert_to_string_ex). You should not mo
The idea is great. In fact this was in my todo list for php 5.3..
Please give me a few more days to review the patch.
Nuno
P.S.: you can add on more point to your list: you get to know the PID of the
exec'ed process instead of the PID of the shell.
- Original Message -
I've just finis
Hi,
So there is some information about the project in the CVS repository.
Let me first say that the project is not mature enough to run your favorite
app. It is capable of executing some small tests, but not complex apps.
You can use either clang or llvm-gcc to compile the stuff, although the la
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
So we do whole program analysis. We start at the first statement in
global scope, model it, then add all its successor to a queue, and
keep modelling until we get to the end of the program. When we get to
a method call, we start modelling the
So we do whole program analysis. We start at the first statement in
global scope, model it, then add all its successor to a queue, and
keep modelling until we get to the end of the program. When we get to
a method call, we start modelling the execution of the method. At the
end of the method, we p
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
PS: If someone wants to give a hand to find the regression... I can
explain how to reproduce.
The easiest way is to use a tool to help reducing the test case
automatically.
I don't know about any specific tool for reducing PHP files, b
Bottom line - rather than reinventing the wheel - is anybody else actually
using Eclipse and has a simple set-up guide for how they have configured
things? Ideally for windows, but I'd like to pull this up on the Linux
boxes as well. If I'm going to have to start working on extension code
it's
PS: If someone wants to give a hand to find the regression... I can
explain how to reproduce.
The easiest way is to use a tool to help reducing the test case
automatically.
I don't know about any specific tool for reducing PHP files, but in the past
I've used delta (http://delta.tigris.org/),
Hi,
I'm happy there's some interest in a PHP optimizer :)
I agree with Paul that PECL's optimizer duplicates way too much stuff from
the Zend engine, which is not practic nor maintainable. (compare for example
with the simple constant folder I implemented some years ago:
http://web.ist.utl.pt/
The patch looks generally ok. However I'll need a few more days to
review it carefully and throughly. (you can merge it in the meantime if
you want).
I'm just slighty concern with the amount of parsing we are now doing by
hand, and with the possible (local) security bugs we might be
introduci
The patch looks generally ok. However I'll need a few more days to review it
carefully and throughly. (you can merge it in the meantime if you want).
I'm just slighty concern with the amount of parsing we are now doing by
hand, and with the possible (local) security bugs we might be introducing..
Nuno Lopes schrieb:
Do you where it's crashing so that I can take a look?
http://pastebin.com/m78a01116
This particular problem should be fixed now. Let me know if PHP still
crashes for you.
Nuno
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
He's the SoC student working on the bechmarking project.
Can someone please approve his account and give him karma to
'php-benchmarks'.
Thanks,
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Hjalmarsson"
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 11:38 AM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Reques
Scott MacVicar schrieb:
Can you set your cflags to -fno-strict-aliasing and try again. This
resolved the issue with the previous report.
Adding -fno-strict-aliasing to CFLAGS works around the issue, yes.
Wow, this is terrible news, as -fno-strict-aliasing usually degrades
performance by a co
The original code actually can be found inside php_cli.c and there it
only checked the 1st line for '#'. if you create a file such as:
#1
#2
The issue here is that the old code only looked at the main script, now
included files ar affected, too.
So either we check in the scanner whether this is
vouched! He will be contributing to the benchmark creation project.
Can someone please take care of his account + karma for the
'php-benchmarks'
module?
Done
Thank you Derick!
Nuno
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
vouched! He will be contributing to the benchmark creation project.
Can someone please take care of his account + karma for the 'php-benchmarks'
module?
Thanks,
Nuno
- Original Message -
Contributing benchmarks
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, v
Hi Paul et all,
I fully understand (and even share) your motivations and goals. However it
seems to me that describing an extension in PHP will lead to loss of
performance, as you cannot capture certain C features in PHP. For example,
there are some internal functions that rely on pointer arit
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 23:06 +, Nuno Lopes wrote:
Currently PHP's benchmarks are very poor. The PHP interpreter is only
timed
against bench.php. Sadly, this doesn't make use of the majority of PHP's
IS that something where some GSoC student might help? If yes, please
nchmarks to PHP. Based on that
experience, we can go about the larger and more difficult task of porting
some web-apps to make representative benchmarks.
Comments, criticisms and volunteers especially welcome,
Nuno Lopes & Paul Biggar
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailin
I've commited a fix. I didn't patch the pcre_internal.h file directly,
otherwise the patch would be reverted on the next upgrade of the pcre lib.
Thanks,
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: "shire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PHP Internals List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:09 PM
Sub
I'll drop it soon from gcov.
Nuno
Sounds good, we should also stop building snapshots and change the
other branches to be built more often.
Scott
On 12 Oct 2008, at 07:59, Gregory Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Isn't it time to retire PHP 4.4 in gcov.php.net? It's just wasted
> statifier'd version of the CGI works fine.. but we're looking a better
> method to directly built the CGI.
you can always use llvm and compile all libraries you need to bitcode
and then link them with PHP. that way will enable more optimizations
and will also reduce the binary size, since llvm w
On Mon Aug 25 06:28 PM, steve wrote:
Has anyone had success compiling PHP with LLVM?
I haven't tried it, here is a good summary:
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Lopes_PHP-JIT-InTwoDays.pdf
In short, it is 'slower' but that seems to be without any caching of the
"bytecode"
So yes, we were abl
C++ is a superset of C thus any C code can be complied as C++ as long as
it doesn't use any
C++ reserved words.
That is not true at all, although it's a common misconception.
Just try the following in C and in C++:
printf("sizeof('x') == %d\n", (int)sizeof('x'));
(hint: they will give you diff
Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 13.08.2008 01:31, Phil Oleson wrote:
Thus the diff -u I sent in.. which resolves the above compiler failure
with g++.
Committed, thanks!
Btw, how and why did you manage to get g++ compiling plain C code?
umm.. how?
cd ext/pspell
/usr/local/php5/bin/phpize
env CC=g++
No!
Last time I benchmark it, it has about 100x slower, so I don't think so.. If
you need to match large amounts of data, just increase the stack size.
ulimit is your friend :)
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: "Arnaud Le Blanc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 200
I already expressed my opinion.. If you know what's the buggy gcc
version, just fail at configure time if it's present.
Nuno
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 20:38, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I wanted to ask people here about this patch. See history in
> http://bugs.php.net/b
I'm not Matt, but I'll try to answer :)
Actually the new re2c scanner already handles the shebang thing, so I
think you can safely remove the explicit support for it in CGI. We had
to had that because CLI doesn't explicitly support the shebang line.
Nuno
P.S.: now it makes sense why we never fou
Ah, nowdocs is php >= 5.3 only. it has been such a long time since last
release that I didn't even remember that..
So, forget my previous comment.
Nuno
- Original Message -
There hasn't been an official release with the NOWDOCS token though.
Scott
Nuno Lopes wrote:
Patc
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: "Dmitry Stogov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Nuno Lopes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Some string changes/optimizations
Hi all,
I had been meaning to update this patch for a w
I didn't test it, but yeah that should fix the # problem. :-) BTW, I also
had other ideas about checking for , etc. tags in the
inline
HTML scanning part, so the largest chunk of HTML is always grabbed (I'll
send the patch in the future; didn't modify anything yet, and it's not
related to the s
Hi,
Both patches seem ok to me. Please ask for a CVS account and prepare
yourself to commit (when your mentor says so) :)
In the second patch maybe you could use zend_memrchr() as well, but you
should get the same results. Also I think that bundling the backwards KMP
would be a nice addition.
Yes, it is. Check the system_with_timeout() function in the run-tests.php
script.
There you've the timeout hardcoded ('$leak_check ? 300 : 60'). You would
just need to make it configurable by some environment var.
I already tried hard-coding both tv_sec and tv_usec to 0 and it makes no
differe
I'd prefer a run-tests.php option that sets the timeout limit in seconds.
Nice idea, but I'm not sure it's achievable under CLI.
Yes, it is. Check the system_with_timeout() function in the run-tests.php
script.
There you've the timeout hardcoded ('$leak_check ? 300 : 60'). You would
just nee
Hi,
Sorry for taking so long to answer, but I'm trying to catch up last stuff.
It's known that usually to optimize things for longer inputs you usually end
up making things for short inputs worst. So IMHO, I think you should have
the len==1 optimization and then use the KMP algorithm. Your impl
>> What would rock is to have it supported by gcov (by us or
>> somewhere else with a public report), would it be possible?
>
> How can I get this done?
I'm adding Nuno to the loop, he is the one leading the gcov initiative
and will surely explain the setup in a better way than me :)
I can add
Nuno Lopes wrote:
Out of curiosity, what's the slowdown without fastcall?
fastcall calling convention assumes passing parameters in registers
instead of pushing them on stack.
yeah, I know. I was asking what's the slowdown that this patch introduces
without the fastcall bits.
Out of curiosity, what's the slowdown without fastcall?
Despite the potential slowdown, I still think this is the way to go. The
engine isn't supposed to crash!
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: "Dmitry Stogov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PHP Internals List"
Cc: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PRO
Hi,
So some comments:
- you have some problems with the indentation. We only use tabs, so please
stick to that. Also, there are some lines that are not indented correctly
- Have you considered the Boyer-Moore algorithm? I think it's a little
faster than KMP (take a look at e.g.
http://www.cs.u
It's time for helly's birthday present from me (and indirectly, Derick,
who did the cp -r) :).
Happy Birthday!
I suspect there may need to be some
changes at gcov.php.net to keep things running smoothly, so this is a
heads up message.
OK, done.
Nuno
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Developm
Thanks Matt for the nice work :)
Also removed the ST_START_[HEREDOC|NOWDOC] states
in the scanner, by doing their work (to catch immediate ending label) in
the
initial heredoc rule.
This one was in my todo list as well. I think there might be other places
where a similar optimization can be
Patch applied, thanks!
I haven't merged my other patch to HEAD yet, but I'll do so ASAP.
Thanks,
Nuno
- Original Message -
Hi Scott,
I noticed that Nuno changed yyless() to be like flex after your commit
(not
in HEAD? I considered that, but figured you guys wanted it different
:-))
Commited, thanks!
Nuno
On 2008-04-06 23:44, Christian Hoffmann wrote:
> Heya,
>
> while building and testing a minimal version of PHP and as such
> disabling the session extension, I discovered that
> ext/standard/tests/general_functions/bug44394_2.phpt fails without the
> session extension bei
Yes, i understand.
It was interesting for me -
how i can decrease false positive and others by improvings on current
script.
If there will be not GSoC participant for this project,
possibly i can do it.
OK, great! :)
Also base questions, which will be asked in any case, are still alive:
Hi,
Thanks for working on this. However I don't think more effort should be
wasted with this script. It's a bogus approach to the problem and it will
always generate many false-positives (disclaimer: I'm the author of the
original script and it was like a POC).
Thus my idea is to move along to
I like the patches. If noone complains please go ahead and commit them.
Thanks,
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: "Etienne Kneuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "php-dev"
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 6:07 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] substr & substr_compare fix
Hi,
please consider the follow
As a side note, I think the following code could be optimized:
Probably it could, but note that the code not just moves the stack
pointer, but also destroys arguments there (zval_ptr_dtor).
+ while (zend_vm_stack_top(TSRMLS_C) != stack_frame) {
+ zval *stack_zval_p = zend_vm_stack_pop(TSRMLS
Hi Dmitry,
The patch looks fine. Although it wastes a bit more memory than the current
implementation, I think it's ok. It also has some memory fragmentation,
which shouldn't be an issue (we don't have functions with 100 arguments :P).
As a side note, I think the following code could be optim
Definitely a great idea, since most linux distributions already bundle this
information and update it frequently.
BTW, your implementation seems to require some security checks for timezone
names like "../../../etc/passwd".
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Orton" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Abstaract Syntax Tree, that should be evaluated at run-time
> by
> zval_update_constant().
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nuno Lopes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 10:50 PM
>> To: Stanislav Malyshev
>> Cc: i
Hi,
I was assigned a class work in the university to compare web
applications architectures, mainly PHP vs
Java+Hibernate+Struts/Stripes. I'll need to provide some benchmarks
for some typical web apps.
Well, I'm a bit afraid that Java may win, because of the usage of
Hibernate, which caches sql
Hi,
I was assigned a class work in the university to compare web
applications architectures, mainly PHP vs
Java+Hibernate+Struts/Stripes. I'll need to provide some benchmarks
for some typical web apps.
Well, I'm a bit afraid that Java may win, because of the usage of
Hibernate, which caches sql s
The other difference is that Venema's implementation assumes that
functions exist that make a variable safe for usage in SQL, HTML, ...
When such a function is used the variable is marked as not tainted... In
the previous mail I showed examples why this is not secure.
GRASP on the other hand hook
I just wanted to ask if there was ever a decision made that said tainted
mode will go into PHP mainstream.
no, there was no decision yet.
It is no secret that I don't like the idea of a taint mode in PHP
because it cannot be made secure and fast at the same time.
/me too. Although I can't a
Hello Hans-Peter,
not that I am aware of. EXTENSIONS file doesn't list any and Ard who is
listed in CREDITS didn't show up in the last couple of months. Read this:
php.net/cvs-php.php and be also prepared to be asked to take care of
firebird installation on http://gcov.php.net :-)
Ah, sure! La
With installing a security update for the pcre3 library on Debian
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announ
ce-2007/msg00177.html), preg_match('|^\(|', 'xxx') suddenly returns 1
instead of 0 using PHP 5.1.6.
the correct value is 0, yes.
The thing is - I have bui
Hi,
It sounds cool, indeed.
The obvious question now is: how it performs with real-world applications?
Have you been able to identify security bugs (either new or already known)?
I don't have time to perform these tests myself, but I would love to see
some results.
Regards,
Nuno
- Origi
I know, I know.. It is on my TODO list for a loong time. I have the program
on my head, I just need to get some time to sit and code it..
BTW: Jean, would Sun be interested in setting up a build machine to run the
PHP test suite and post the results to a central build DB?
Nuno
- Origina
It would be interesting, yes. My university has been discontinuing the
Solaris servers and now I only have access to an ancient Solaris 7 server.
Even more interesting would be to get your patches to fix those bugs :)
Thanks,
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Thompson" <[EMAIL PROT
we would like to know whether at php org level there are any test
results available / published / shared per OS (like Solaris, RH in
particular)
Not grouped, but we do have all the test results here:
http://news.php.net/php.qa
In addition to what Derick said, there is a "reference" build and t
No, no and no!
The gcc 4 -fvisibility patch wasn't rejected. It's a no-op and although it
is only useful for gcc 4 users, it brings many benefits for them!
So please keep that in the PHP 5.3 TODO.
Nuno
- Original Message -
Hi,
I updated the 5.3 todo list [1] yesterday evening. I al
I already use 2k3 to compile my binaries or to develop, it works
pretty well. The 2k5 brings more change and require a couple of
important changes in our build (like the manifest support or what
other describe in this thread).
Uhm I use VS 2005 to build PHP (vanila) for quite some time and it wo
nlopess Fri Sep 14 15:28:04 2007 UTC
Log:
changes to run-tests.php:
- change %s to %a
- make %s = [^\r\n]+
- fix tests accordingly
I think this is a very bad change. While tests of bundled extensions
can be updated accordingly, pecl extension tests have no way to be
version agnostic
I had a quick question about this. When would strlen('abcd') be execuated?
Say I had the code:
$a = false; // This set by external input
if ( $a )
$b = strlen('abcd');
Would the optimizer work out the length before the program starts to run?
Or would the optimizer wait until it knows the strl
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 20:02 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> >My proposal is the following:
> >some functions when fed with constant arguments always return a
> >constant
> >value, too. e.g.:
> >strlen('abcd') === 4.
>
> I like the general idea.
>
&
>My proposal is the following:
>some functions when fed with constant arguments always return a constant
>value, too. e.g.:
>strlen('abcd') === 4.
I like the general idea.
Would there be some caveats with stuff like this if it is possible to
change the charset at runtime?
I guess it is importan
Mmm... but that means dictating which features can or can't go into an
extension or a specific build system purely on the level of outside
interest in them.
Steph, isn't the goal of "core" to contain things that are of common use
and are not for niche uses and wouldn't lack of interest impl
Nuno Lopes wrote:
> My proposal is the following:
> some functions when fed with constant arguments always return a constant
> value, too. e.g.:
> strlen('abcd') === 4.
wouldn't that be called "deterministic" and not "const"?
yeah, exactly. I w
Hi,
Following my last post on bytecode optimization
(http://news.php.net/php.internals/32113), I would like to discuss a few
more things.
The patch in that e-mail allowed the engine itself to do transformations
like, e.g.:
$a = 1*2*3*4*5+1-0; --> $a = 121;
However the patch is now a bit d
It is a nice patch - but I'm seeing some errors that I don't understand
yet when I use it - like this:
Warning: preg_match(): Compilation failed: missing terminating ] for
character class at offset 5 in /home/zoe/BUILDS/php52/run-tests.php on
line 1609
I'm not having the best afternoon :-( -
OK, so basically it is impossible to fix the current regex to match what
we
want (I had a quick chat with the PCRE author and he thinks the same).
I propose the following patch:
http://web.ist.utl.pt/nuno.lopes/php_run_tests_%s.txt
The main changes are:
'%s' => '[^\r\n]+'
Nice patch! The onl
now i get the issue. It grabbs more than one line! This means
run-tests.php has to be fixed. The whole thing is designed under
the assumption that %s catches no new lines and hence only one
line.
That would be the best answer but I think it's a difficult fix and
whatever it was might break ot
12) Merge the GCC 4 -fvisibility patch
-1 (eventually make it a configure option first? PHP is a API mess)
The patch is safe because otherwise PHP wouldn't work on windows (as windows
doesn't export the symbols by default).
Nuno
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To uns
That patch is a very good idea, but it does not work there are symbols
that are no lomger exported on libxml extension , and although
everything compiles, I ended with a broken PHP.
Can you give a bit more details on what is broken? Does it mean there's a
problem on Windows too, since Windows d
Well we don't support that syntax at this moment. If you are saying
that we could add support for such syntax.. it does seem a good
idea, but in that case we would need to modify a few rules of the
grammar (like adding a const_expr production, and allow
static_scalar derive it, etc..).
Ri
1) Backport the namespaces patch for PHP 6
2) Symlink the intl extension from PECL, but leave it disabled by
default as is the case with all extensions dependent on external libs
I haven't looked at it yet.
3) Apply the Late Static Binding Patch
+0
4) Implement David's Circular Garbage
I made a patch to implement constant folding optimization in the
Zend engine.
The patch is available at:
http://web.ist.utl.pt/nuno.lopes/zend_constant_folding.txt
I like the idea a lot, however I think this patch has one
significant downside - as far as I understand, it doesn't enable
co
Hi,
I made a patch to implement constant folding optimization in the Zend engine.
The patch is available at:
http://web.ist.utl.pt/nuno.lopes/zend_constant_folding.txt
Please review & commit.
Regards,
Nuno
P.S.: 'make test' shows 2 regressions with this patch
(tests/run-test/test005.phpt
Off the shelf garbage collectors such as BDW would be inappropriate
because we use some weird kinds of "pointers" (such as object handles)
stored in weird kinds of ways (such as a zend_hash object). I think it
would be pretty inefficient, since those implementations just scan the
stack, registers
I'm not interested in filing a minimum of 100 bug reports when you
don't have the manpower to process them, I've resolved most of them
already (at least the ones related to the php base) and any that I
haven't I've noted as "Broken - DNU" so I don't pass anything
unstable on to my clients.
About the patch, the zval_*_p() functions don't really need to exist..
they can be macros as well.
As I said, if those were macros, it would be very difficult to squeeze
more than one statement into them.
Having multiple statements in Z_DELREF_P will also break that code. It
seems to me inline
I think this is a pretty good idea. It can also have some use if we
decide to investigate the usage of an off-the-shelf (conservative)
garbage collector such as Boehm's (maybe in next year's SoC).
About the patch, the zval_*_p() functions don't really need to exist..
they can be macros as w
Things are not that simple.
I would advise you to read a more than one year thread about the very same
subject: http://marc.info/?l=php-dev&m=113919491216978
Nuno
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PHP Developers Mailing List"
Sent: Thursday, Aug
t run-tests.php should
be rewritten :P
""Nuno Lopes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently we have moved http://gcov.php.net to a new (and much faster)
> server. This allowed us to reduce the time to build all branches to "just"
> 2 days (
Hi,
Recently we have moved http://gcov.php.net to a new (and much faster)
server. This allowed us to reduce the time to build all branches to "just" 2
days (compared with almost one week that would take previously).
However I'm still not happy :P The server has 2x2 CPU cores and I would like
t
On Thu, July 19, 2007 12:45 am, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Richard Lynch wrote:
What is the status of bringing PHP build process up to current
automake/autoconf/libtool versions?...
Or you could try simply using the current versions. They work fine.
Yes, they all fail equally well. :-)
I also
1 - 100 of 348 matches
Mail list logo
