How about using git for the actual documents too.. No better way to
collaborate imho.
Do you mean using github or integrating git VCS in a RFC app ? If you mean
using github, it is a convenient way to store document evolution and comments,
but what about the voting process, let alone RFC
On 27 July 2012 13:15, Laupretre François
francois.laupre...@francetv.fr wrote:
How about using git for the actual documents too.. No better way to
collaborate imho.
Do you mean using github or integrating git VCS in a RFC app ? If you mean
using github, it is a convenient way to store
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Gábor Fási m...@maerlyn.eu wrote:
On 27 July 2012 13:15, Laupretre François
francois.laupre...@francetv.fr wrote:
How about using git for the actual documents too.. No better way to
collaborate imho.
Do you mean using github or integrating git VCS in a
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Gábor Fási m...@maerlyn.eu wrote:
On 27 July 2012 13:15, Laupretre François
francois.laupre...@francetv.fr wrote:
How about using git for the actual documents too.. No better way to
Hi!
Secondly, I noticed that Python's PEPs are numbered, unlike PHP's
RFCs. Whilst they aren't quite the same thing, I wonder if this would
be useful, particularly since it provides a simple and unambiguous way
to refer to one, e.g. RFC 123 instead of RFC on how to write an RFC.
Why have
Stas Malyshev wrote:
Why have numbers if we can use URLs? URLs both uniquely identify the RFC
and suggest what they are about. Can you say what PEP 410 is about? How
about https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess?
That sounds way better, agreed.
I have yet to meet one person who was confused
Hi Andrew:
On 25 Jul 2012, at 22:50, Andrew Faulds wrote:
I think someone (perhaps me) should write an RFC on how to write an RFC
Note that a new page create on the wiki in the RFC namespace comes with a
template that gives some guidance on how to write an RFC.
Lukas based it on my original
Hi Stefan,
I made an RFC page on it. http://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto
It's not really an RFC, more a meta-RFC or informational wiki page. It
would helpful if you could edit it too. I just want to make an obvious
go-to place for info on this.
Thanks.
On 26/07/12 08:49, Stefan Marr wrote:
Hi
On 07/26/2012 11:41 AM, Andrew Faulds wrote:
Hi Stefan,
I made an RFC page on it. http://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto
It's not really an RFC, more a meta-RFC or informational wiki page. It
would helpful if you could edit it too. I just want to make an obvious
go-to place for info on this.
What
Florian Anderiasch wrote:
I made an RFC page on it.http://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto
It's not really an RFC, more a meta-RFC or informational wiki page. It
would helpful if you could edit it too. I just want to make an obvious
go-to place for info on this.
What I see as most in need of upgrade
There was a time when one could have written an app for it in PHP ;)
Right. We all know from the beginning that a wiki is better than nothing but,
when the number of users/documents grows, it becomes very hard to keep the
information up-to-date.
Another problem is that documents and their
On 26/07/12 16:44, Laupretre François wrote:
There was a time when one could have written an app for it in PHP ;)
Right. We all know from the beginning that a wiki is better than nothing but,
when the number of users/documents grows, it becomes very hard to keep the
information up-to-date.
I'm in favor of an RFC app on the condition it has a nice UX and has
complete unit tests.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 26/07/12 18:46, Levi Morrison wrote:
I'm in favor of an RFC app on the condition it has a nice UX and has
complete unit tests.
Welp, guess it's time for me to learn how to unit-test properly.
--
Andrew Faulds
http://ajf.me/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Andrew Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 26/07/12 18:46, Levi Morrison wrote:
I'm in favor of an RFC app on the condition it has a nice UX and has
complete unit tests.
Welp, guess it's time for me to learn how to unit-test properly.
--
Andrew Faulds
On 26/07/12 18:53, Kris Craig wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Andrew Faulds a...@ajf.me
mailto:a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 26/07/12 18:46, Levi Morrison wrote:
I'm in favor of an RFC app on the condition it has a nice UX
and has
complete unit tests.
On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Kris Craig wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Andrew Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 26/07/12 18:46, Levi Morrison wrote:
I'm in favor of an RFC app on the condition it has a nice UX and has
complete unit tests.
Welp, guess it's time for me to learn how
On 26/07/12 19:11, Evert Pot wrote:
On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Kris Craig wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Andrew Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 26/07/12 18:46, Levi Morrison wrote:
I'm in favor of an RFC app on the condition it has a nice UX and has
complete unit tests.
Welp,
On 26/07/12 16:44, Laupretre François wrote:
There was a time when one could have written an app for it in PHP ;)
Right. We all know from the beginning that a wiki is better than nothing but,
when the number of users/documents grows, it becomes very hard to keep the
information up-to-date.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrew Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 26/07/12 16:44, Laupretre François wrote:
There was a time when one could have written an app for it in PHP ;)
Right. We all know from the beginning that a wiki is better than nothing
but, when the number of
On 26/07/12 20:58, Kris Craig wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrew Faulds a...@ajf.me
mailto:a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 26/07/12 16:44, Laupretre François wrote:
There was a time when one could have written an app for it
in PHP ;)
Right. We all
Hi there,
First off I'd like to apologise for being a generally useless and overly
reactive poster on this list. I'm going to exercise more self-constraint
now after noticing I made more posts on this list this month than anyone
else, this month.
Anyway, onto the subject of this email, in
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Andrew Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi there,
First off I'd like to apologise for being a generally useless and overly
reactive poster on this list. I'm going to exercise more self-constraint
now after noticing I made more posts on this list this month than
Andrew Faulds wrote:
Secondly, I noticed that Python's PEPs are numbered, unlike PHP's
RFCs. Whilst they aren't quite the same thing, I wonder if this would
be useful, particularly since it provides a simple and unambiguous way
to refer to one, e.g. RFC 123 instead of RFC on how to write an
24 matches
Mail list logo
