Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 17:37 24/08/2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Steph wrote:
Hi Rasmus,
Steph wrote:
If there's the capability to run PHP 6 without Unicode support, surely
there's no reason for extensions to lose back compatability when
they're
updated...?
That's going to be
At 17:46 24/08/2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 17:37 24/08/2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Steph wrote:
Hi Rasmus,
Steph wrote:
If there's the capability to run PHP 6 without Unicode support, surely
there's no reason for extensions to lose back compatability when
Zeev Suraski wrote:
Why? A great deal of users will be running with unicode semantics
turned off, and I don't see a good reason to break source compatibility
for them. For example, if Foo Inc. wrote a module for PHP 4, and they
want to migrate to PHP 6 - it should be a simple recompile.
At 18:05 24/08/2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
Why? A great deal of users will be running with unicode semantics
turned off, and I don't see a good reason to break source compatibility
for them. For example, if Foo Inc. wrote a module for PHP 4, and they
want to migrate to
At 08:05 AM 8/24/2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
Why? A great deal of users will be running with unicode semantics
turned off, and I don't see a good reason to break source compatibility
for them. For example, if Foo Inc. wrote a module for PHP 4, and they
want to migrate
