On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Jakub Vrana wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
Perhaps limiting the number of bug report by IP per day and/or limiting
the number of bugs with the same words should be implemented.
I agree. No one likes Write here the text from image.
IPs can be easily spoofed; we want a
Derick Rethans wrote:
Perhaps limiting the number of bug report by IP per day and/or limiting
the number of bugs with the same words should be implemented.
I agree. No one likes Write here the text from image.
IPs can be easily spoofed; we want a turing test.
Will you agree with this
Olivier Hill wrote:
Perhaps limiting the number of bug report by IP per day and/or limiting
the number of bugs with the same words should be implemented.
I agree. No one likes Write here the text from image.
Jakub Vrana
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
- Original Message -
From: Jakub Vrana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 5:17 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Spammer on Bugs page
Olivier Hill wrote:
Perhaps limiting the number of bug report by IP per day and/or limiting
the number of bugs
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Jakub Vrana wrote:
Olivier Hill wrote:
Perhaps limiting the number of bug report by IP per day and/or limiting
the number of bugs with the same words should be implemented.
I agree. No one likes Write here the text from image.
IPs can be easily spoofed; we want a
There is some spammer on the bugs page who updates all bugs and adds a new
comment to every bug with a URL to a porn page. What can we do? My mailbox
gets fuller and fuller...
-
Uwe Schindler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.php.net
NSAPI SAPI developer
Erlangen, Germany
--
PHP Internals -
Hello,
Perhaps we should implement one of the read this obscure image and
type the number into this text box scheme into all the bug post and
update forms?
--
Best regards,
Jasonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, July 20, 2004, 11:57:25 AM, you wrote:
US
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0400, Jason Garber wrote:
Perhaps we should implement one of the read this obscure image and
type the number into this text box scheme into all the bug post and
update forms?
I'm in the middle of making a quick and dirty CAPTCHA routine for the bug
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Daniel Convissor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0400, Jason Garber wrote:
Perhaps we should implement one of the read this obscure image and
type the number into this text box scheme into all the bug post and
update forms?
I'm in the middle of
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 07:47:41PM +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Daniel Convissor wrote:
I'm in the middle of making a quick and dirty CAPTCHA routine for the bug
form on pear.php.net. I'll post the diff when it's ready.
We'll also need something like that for cvs
I know this is just a quick measure, but isn't the whole idea to not
emit the code in plain text on the form? It's really very easy to
scrape it out.
--Wez.
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:32:44 -0400, Daniel Convissor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's pretty crude. All it does is set a session var with
Hi Wez:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Wez Furlong wrote:
I know this is just a quick measure, but isn't the whole idea to not
emit the code in plain text on the form? It's really very easy to
scrape it out.
Yes, it is simple to scrape. But, I suspect that the problem is coming
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 03:38:26PM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote:
Hmm... guess it would be a good idea to delete the CAPTCHA value from the
session data after the form is submitted to avoid multiple submissions
using the same value.
Done. Here are the complete diffs...
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Daniel Convissor wrote:
Hi Wez:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Wez Furlong wrote:
I know this is just a quick measure, but isn't the whole idea to not
emit the code in plain text on the form? It's really very easy to
scrape it out.
Yes, it is simple to
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 10:17:59PM +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
You're wrong, for each comment there were four requests done with
curl...
Crap. Thanks for the heads up. Back to the drawing board...
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
Hi Daniel,
Take a look over @ Colin Viebrock's Blog and see how his turing test
works (http://www.viebrock.ca/code/11/email-protection) and I posted
to you earlier how to do sound turing links.
Hope this enspires you.
Regards
--jm
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:28:06 -0400, Daniel Convissor
[EMAIL
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 04:46 pm, Jacques Marneweck wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Take a look over @ Colin Viebrock's Blog and see how his turing test
works (http://www.viebrock.ca/code/11/email-protection) and I posted
to you earlier how to do sound turing links.
I was gonna hack a quick image
Jeremy Johnstone wrote:
I was gonna hack a quick image generation script together, but the URL you
gave seems to work fine already. The links directly to the relevant code are:
And if you follow the link at the end of the page, you should read some
reasons why Turing protection is not a good
18 matches
Mail list logo
