Hi Benoit,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Benoit Schildknecht bensor...@neuf.fr
wrote:
Why hasn't it closed ? It's way past the 25th.
Vote was closed before the end date. IIRC.
It's withdrawn status, I suppose.
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net
Hi Zeev,
On 11 March 2015 at 18:48, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
Rest assured that if I see that they both seem to be failing as we near the
end of the voting time, I'll retract the Coercive STH RFC - and I'll
actually vote in favor of the dual mode RFC,
People sometimes tell me that
Zeev,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Derick Rethans [mailto:der...@php.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:37 PM
To: Zeev Suraski
Cc: Anthony Ferrara; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [VOTE][RFC
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015, Zeev Suraski wrote:
From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
function bar(float $x)
$foo = 1;
bar($foo); // will definitely fail in strict mode
No, actually it won't fail in strict mode:
-Original Message-
From: Derick Rethans [mailto:der...@php.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:37 PM
To: Zeev Suraski
Cc: Anthony Ferrara; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RE: [VOTE][RFC] Coercive Scalar Type Hints
You're right, sorry. Reverse
It was actually Anthony who proposed that I do that. He also proposed that
if they both pass, we'll have a vote to choose between them.
For a lot of people, the dual mode and coercive STH RFCs aren't a zero sum
game. They just want ONE of them to pass to have some sort of scalar type
hinting,
Zeev,
You also stated above that false-bool is not supported (I'm guessing
you
meant float-bool). So users would be able to pass 4.3 to a bool
typehint,
but not 4.3? This behavior seems very arbitrary and confusing.
It may be confusing, but only academically so. Again, this approach tries
On 11 March 2015 at 18:46, Eli e...@eliw.com wrote:
Benoit ... actually Anthony's original proposal specifically was
designed to be live at the same time as this alternative proposal. And
it's even mentioned in the proposal (stating that it would stay open
until the 13th or when the
Benoit ... actually Anthony's original proposal specifically was
designed to be live at the same time as this alternative proposal. And
it's even mentioned in the proposal (stating that it would stay open
until the 13th or when the alternative proposal voting ended - whichever
was later)
So this
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 8:28 PM
To: Zeev Suraski
Cc: Theodore Brown; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [VOTE][RFC] Coercive Scalar Type Hints
Zeev,
You also stated above that false
10 matches
Mail list logo
