On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:00:36 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Commit 4287861dca9d ("dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add Tegra186 compatible
> string") introduced a jsonschema syntax error as a result of a rebase
> gone wrong. Fix it.
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Fix json-schema syntax
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:31 AM Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> 在 2021/6/22 下午4:14, Yongji Xie 写道:
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:50 PM Jason Wang wrote:
> >>
> >> 在 2021/6/22 下午3:22, Yongji Xie 写道:
> We need fix a way to propagate the error to the userspace.
>
> E.g if we want to stop
在 2021/6/22 下午4:14, Yongji Xie 写道:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:50 PM Jason Wang wrote:
在 2021/6/22 下午3:22, Yongji Xie 写道:
We need fix a way to propagate the error to the userspace.
E.g if we want to stop the deivce, we will delay the status reset until
we get respose from the userspace?
I
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:58:14PM -0400:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 04:48:24PM +0900, 'Dominique MARTINET' wrote:
> > Thanks, that should be good.
> >
> > Do you want me to send a follow-up patch with the two extra checks
> > (tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE -1)) >
On 2021-06-21 15:32, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 2021/6/21 19:59, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-06-21 11:34, John Garry wrote:
On 21/06/2021 11:00, Lu Baolu wrote:
void iommu_set_dma_strict(bool force)
{
if (force == true)
iommu_dma_strict = true;
else if
On 2021-06-22 17:06, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 4:35 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi Doug,
On 2021-06-22 00:52, Douglas Anderson wrote:
This patch attempts to put forward a proposal for enabling non-strict
DMA on a device-by-device basis. The patch series requests
Hey Linus,
Please git pull the following branch:
git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/swiotlb.git
stable/for-linus-5.14
which has the regression for the DMA operations where the offset was
ignored and corruptions would appear.
Going forward there will be a cleanups to
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 04:48:24PM +0900, 'Dominique MARTINET' wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 09:16:43AM -0400:
> > The beaty of 'devel' and 'linux-next' is that they can be reshuffled and
> > mangled. I pushed them original patch from Bumyong there and will let
> >
On Sat, 19 Jun 2021, Claire Chang wrote:
> Add a new function, swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem, for the io_tlb_mem struct
> initialization to make the code reusable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Tested-by: Stefano Stabellini
> Tested-by: Will Deacon
Acked-by:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:06 PM Saravana Kannan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:06:02AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 4:35 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Doug,
> > > >
>
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:06:02AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 4:35 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Doug,
> > >
> > > On 2021-06-22 00:52, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patch
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:06:02AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 4:35 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
> >
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > On 2021-06-22 00:52, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch attempts to put forward a proposal for enabling non-strict
> > > DMA on a
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:46 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 7:56 PM Saravana Kannan wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:53 PM Douglas Anderson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > In the patch ("drivers: base: Add bits to struct device to control
> > > iommu strictness") we
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:46 AM John Garry wrote:
>
> On 22/06/2021 00:52, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> >
> > This patch attempts to put forward a proposal for enabling non-strict
> > DMA on a device-by-device basis. The patch series requests non-strict
> > DMA for the Qualcomm SDHCI
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:45 AM Rajat Jain wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:53 PM Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
> >
> > In the patch ("drivers: base: Add bits to struct device to control
> > iommu strictness") we add the ability for devices to tell us about
> > their IOMMU strictness
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:53 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> In the patch ("drivers: base: Add bits to struct device to control
> iommu strictness") we add the ability for devices to tell us about
> their IOMMU strictness requirements. Let's now take that into account
> in the IOMMU layer.
>
> A
On 2021-06-22 15:27, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 2021-06-22 17:41, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-06-22 08:11, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 2021-06-21 21:15, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-06-18 03:51, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
Add a quirk IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_TLB_INV_ALL to
On 22/06/2021 00:52, Douglas Anderson wrote:
This patch attempts to put forward a proposal for enabling non-strict
DMA on a device-by-device basis. The patch series requests non-strict
DMA for the Qualcomm SDHCI controller as a first device to enable,
getting a nice bump in performance with
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:53 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 7:05 PM Lu Baolu wrote:
> >
> > On 6/22/21 7:52 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > @@ -1519,7 +1542,8 @@ static int iommu_get_def_domain_type(struct device
> > > *dev)
> > >
> > > static int
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 7:05 PM Lu Baolu wrote:
>
> On 6/22/21 7:52 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > @@ -1519,7 +1542,8 @@ static int iommu_get_def_domain_type(struct device
> > *dev)
> >
> > static int iommu_group_alloc_default_domain(struct bus_type *bus,
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 7:56 PM Saravana Kannan wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:53 PM Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
> >
> > In the patch ("drivers: base: Add bits to struct device to control
> > iommu strictness") we add the ability for devices to tell us about
> > their IOMMU strictness
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 7:58 AM Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> From: Thierry Reding
>
> Commit 4287861dca9d ("dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add Tegra186 compatible
> string") introduced a jsonschema syntax error as a result of a rebase
> gone wrong. Fix it.
>
> Fixes: 4287861dca9d ("dt-bindings: arm-smmu:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 4:35 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On 2021-06-22 00:52, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> >
> > This patch attempts to put forward a proposal for enabling non-strict
> > DMA on a device-by-device basis. The patch series requests non-strict
> > DMA for the Qualcomm
Hi Robin,
On 2021-06-22 17:41, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-06-22 08:11, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 2021-06-21 21:15, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-06-18 03:51, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
Add a quirk IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_TLB_INV_ALL to invalidate entire
context
with tlb_flush_all()
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 2:17 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 9:16 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> > If a property has an 'items' list, then a 'minItems' or 'maxItems' with the
> > same size as the list is redundant and can be dropped. Note that is DT
> > schema
This commit is dedicated to fix incorrect conversion from
cpu_addr to page address in cases when we get virtual
address which allocated in the vmalloc range.
As the result, virt_to_page() cannot convert this address
properly and return incorrect page address.
Need to detect such cases and obtains
On 2021-06-22 08:11, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 2021-06-21 21:15, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-06-18 03:51, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
Add a quirk IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_TLB_INV_ALL to invalidate entire context
with tlb_flush_all() callback in partial walk flush to improve unmap
On 2021-06-22 00:52, Douglas Anderson wrote:
In the patch ("drivers: base: Add bits to struct device to control
iommu strictness") we add the ability for devices to tell us about
their IOMMU strictness requirements. Let's now take that into account
in the IOMMU layer.
A few notes here:
*
Hi Doug,
On 2021-06-22 00:52, Douglas Anderson wrote:
This patch attempts to put forward a proposal for enabling non-strict
DMA on a device-by-device basis. The patch series requests non-strict
DMA for the Qualcomm SDHCI controller as a first device to enable,
getting a nice bump in
On 2021-06-21 18:51, Ross Philipson wrote:
On 6/18/21 2:32 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-06-18 17:12, Ross Philipson wrote:
The IOMMU should always be set to default translated type after
the PMRs are disabled to protect the MLE from DMA.
Signed-off-by: Ross Philipson
---
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 9:16 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> If a property has an 'items' list, then a 'minItems' or 'maxItems' with the
> same size as the list is redundant and can be dropped. Note that is DT
> schema specific behavior and not standard json-schema behavior. The tooling
> will
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:50 PM Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> 在 2021/6/22 下午3:22, Yongji Xie 写道:
> >> We need fix a way to propagate the error to the userspace.
> >>
> >> E.g if we want to stop the deivce, we will delay the status reset until
> >> we get respose from the userspace?
> >>
> > I didn't
在 2021/6/22 下午3:22, Yongji Xie 写道:
We need fix a way to propagate the error to the userspace.
E.g if we want to stop the deivce, we will delay the status reset until
we get respose from the userspace?
I didn't get how to delay the status reset. And should it be a DoS
that we want to fix if
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 09:16:43AM -0400:
> The beaty of 'devel' and 'linux-next' is that they can be reshuffled and
> mangled. I pushed them original patch from Bumyong there and will let
> it sit for a day and then create a stable branch and give it to Linus.
Thanks,
Hi Jean,
On 6/18/21 5:20 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Extract the code that sets up the IOMMU infrastructure from IORT, since
> it can be reused by VIOT. Move it one level up into a new
> acpi_iommu_configure_id() function, which calls the IORT parsing
> function which in turn calls the
Hi Jean,
On 6/18/21 5:20 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Passing a 64-bit address width to iommu_setup_dma_ops() is valid on
> virtual platforms, but isn't currently possible. The overflow check in
> iommu_dma_init_domain() prevents this even when @dma_base isn't 0. Pass
> a limit address
Thanks,
applied to the dma-mapping tree.
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Thanks,
applied to the dma-mapping tree.
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
.On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:07 PM Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> 在 2021/6/21 下午6:41, Yongji Xie 写道:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 5:14 PM Jason Wang wrote:
> >>
> >> 在 2021/6/15 下午10:13, Xie Yongji 写道:
> >>> This VDUSE driver enables implementing vDPA devices in userspace.
> >>> The vDPA device's control
Hi Robin,
On 2021-06-21 21:15, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-06-18 03:51, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
Add a quirk IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_TLB_INV_ALL to invalidate entire context
with tlb_flush_all() callback in partial walk flush to improve unmap
performance on select few platforms where the cost of
40 matches
Mail list logo
