On 4/26/2015 2:16 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 18:55 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 11:33 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Curious why these weren't posted to the mailing list.
Apologies for that. I was thinking of this tree as *only* collecting
the
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
Since this got pulled anyway, do you plan to follow-up with patches to
limit the graphics RMRR exception to the known and acceptable uses and
document them, or should I send a revert patch? I don't think what
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 10:00 -0400, Linda Knippers wrote:
On 4/26/2015 2:16 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 18:55 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 11:33 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Curious why these weren't posted to the mailing list.
Apologies for
On 4/27/2015 11:48 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
Since this got pulled anyway, do you plan to follow-up with patches to
limit the graphics RMRR exception to the known and acceptable uses and
document them, or
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 08:48 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
Since this got pulled anyway, do you plan to follow-up with patches to
limit the graphics RMRR exception to the known and acceptable uses and
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 09:39 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
David,
Since this got pulled anyway, do you plan to follow-up with patches to
limit the graphics RMRR exception to the known and acceptable uses and
document them, or should I send a revert patch? I don't think what we
have here is
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 08:48 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Alex Williamson
alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
Since this got pulled anyway, do you plan to follow-up with
patches to
limit the graphics RMRR exception to the known and acceptable uses
and
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 18:12 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 09:39 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
David,
Since this got pulled anyway, do you plan to follow-up with patches to
limit the graphics RMRR exception to the known and acceptable uses and
document them, or
Linus,
Please pull the following changes (since v3.19) from
git://git.infradead.org/intel-iommu.git
This lays a little of the groundwork for upcoming Shared Virtual
Memory support — fixing some bogus #defines for capability bits and
adding the new ones, and starting to use the new wider
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 11:33 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Curious why these weren't posted to the mailing list.
Apologies for that. I was thinking of this tree as *only* collecting
the stuff for SVM, and had mostly forgotten the bug-fixes. I was going
to post the series once I had it all in
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 18:55 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 11:33 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
Curious why these weren't posted to the mailing list.
Apologies for that. I was thinking of this tree as *only* collecting
the stuff for SVM, and had mostly forgotten the
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 09:51 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
Linus,
Please pull the following changes (since v3.19) from
git://git.infradead.org/intel-iommu.git
This lays a little of the groundwork for upcoming Shared Virtual
Memory support — fixing some bogus #defines for
12 matches
Mail list logo
