> On Jun 15, 2021, at 12:05 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jun 15, 2021, at 3:42 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-06-07 19:25, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> From: Robin Murphy
>>> The Mediatek driver is not the only one which might want a basic
>>> address-based gathering behaviour, so
> On Jun 15, 2021, at 3:42 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> On 2021-06-07 19:25, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> From: Robin Murphy
>> The Mediatek driver is not the only one which might want a basic
>> address-based gathering behaviour, so although it's arguably simple
>> enough to open-code, let's factor
On 2021-06-15 13:29, Yong Wu wrote:
On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 11:25 -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
From: Robin Murphy
The Mediatek driver is not the only one which might want a basic
address-based gathering behaviour, so although it's arguably simple
enough to open-code, let's factor it out for the
On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 11:25 -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> From: Robin Murphy
>
> The Mediatek driver is not the only one which might want a basic
> address-based gathering behaviour, so although it's arguably simple
> enough to open-code, let's factor it out for the sake of cleanliness.
> Let's
On 2021-06-07 19:25, Nadav Amit wrote:
From: Robin Murphy
The Mediatek driver is not the only one which might want a basic
address-based gathering behaviour, so although it's arguably simple
enough to open-code, let's factor it out for the sake of cleanliness.
Let's also take this opportunity
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 11:25:38AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> From: Robin Murphy
>
> The Mediatek driver is not the only one which might want a basic
> address-based gathering behaviour, so although it's arguably simple
> enough to open-code, let's factor it out for the sake of cleanliness.
>
From: Robin Murphy
The Mediatek driver is not the only one which might want a basic
address-based gathering behaviour, so although it's arguably simple
enough to open-code, let's factor it out for the sake of cleanliness.
Let's also take this opportunity to document the intent of these
helpers
