On 2020-04-20 3:39 pm, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 04:06:49PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:47:10PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
As far as I understand it, the page table can be accessed concurrently
since the framework doesn't seem to provide any
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 04:06:49PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:47:10PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > As far as I understand it, the page table can be accessed concurrently
> > since the framework doesn't seem to provide any serialization /
> > locking, shouldn't
Hi Maxime,
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:47:10PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> As far as I understand it, the page table can be accessed concurrently
> since the framework doesn't seem to provide any serialization /
> locking, shouldn't we have some locks to prevent concurrent access?
The dma-iommu
Hi Jörg,
Thanks for your review, I'll fix the issues you pointed out and I left
out.
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 04:36:06PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 07:15:14PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > +struct sun50i_iommu_domain {
> > + struct iommu_domain domain;
> > +
> > +
Hi Maxime,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 07:15:14PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> +struct sun50i_iommu_domain {
> + struct iommu_domain domain;
> +
> + /* Number of devices attached to the domain */
> + refcount_t refcnt;
> +
> + /* Lock to modify the Directory Table */
> +
