Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Handle SG length overflow better

2019-08-06 Thread Joerg Roedel
Hi Robin, On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > Since scatterlist dimensions are all unsigned ints, in the relatively > rare cases where a device's max_segment_size is set to UINT_MAX, then > the "cur_len + s_length <= max_len" check in __finalise_sg() will always >

Re: Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)

2019-08-06 Thread Lendacky, Thomas
On 8/6/19 9:06 AM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 06.08.2019, 16:04 +0200 schrieb Christoph Hellwig: >> Ok, does this work? >> >> -- >> From 34d35f335a98f515f2516b515051e12eae744c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Christoph Hellwig >> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 14:33:23 +0300 >> Subject:

Re: [PATCH v2] iommu: arm-smmu-v3: Mark expected switch fall-through

2019-08-06 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 04:26:01PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Joerg -- if you'd like to pick this up as a fix, feel free, otherwise I'll > include it in my pull request for 5.4. Applied to iommu/fixes, thanks.

Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Detach domain when move device out of group

2019-08-06 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:14:58AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Applied to iommu/fixes, thanks. ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org

Re: Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)

2019-08-06 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 06.08.2019, 16:04 +0200 schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > Ok, does this work? > > -- > From 34d35f335a98f515f2516b515051e12eae744c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Christoph Hellwig > Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 14:33:23 +0300 > Subject: dma-direct: fix DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING > >

Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Handle MSI mappings separately

2019-08-06 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 04:32:38PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 17 ++--- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Applied to iommu/fixes, thanks Robin. ___ iommu mailing list

Re: Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)

2019-08-06 Thread Lendacky, Thomas
On 8/6/19 6:33 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:13:29AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: >> Hi Christoph, >> >> I just found a regression where my NVMe device is no longer able to set >> up its HMB. >> >> After subject commit dma_direct_alloc_pages() is no longer initializing >>

Re: Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)

2019-08-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Ok, does this work? -- >From 34d35f335a98f515f2516b515051e12eae744c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 14:33:23 +0300 Subject: dma-direct: fix DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING The new DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING needs to actually assign a dma_addr to work. Also

Re: Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)

2019-08-06 Thread Lendacky, Thomas
On 8/6/19 10:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 02:18:49PM +, Lendacky, Thomas wrote: >> I think you need to keep everything inside the original if statement since >> the caller is expecting a page pointer to be returned in this case and not >> the page_address() which

Re: Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)

2019-08-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 04:06:58PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > > dma_direct_free_pages() then needs the same check, as otherwise the cpu > address is treated as a cookie instead of a real address and the > encryption needs to be re-enabled. Ok, lets try this one instead: -- >From

Re: Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)

2019-08-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:59:40PM +, Lendacky, Thomas wrote: > As long as two different cookie types (page pointer for encrypted DMA > and virtual address returned from page_address() for unencrypted DMA) > is ok. I'm just not familiar with how the cookie is used in any other > functions, if

Re: Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)

2019-08-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 02:18:49PM +, Lendacky, Thomas wrote: > I think you need to keep everything inside the original if statement since > the caller is expecting a page pointer to be returned in this case and not > the page_address() which is returned when the DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING >

Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: fix page attributes for dma_mmap_*

2019-08-06 Thread Will Deacon
On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 08:48:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 11:38:03AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > So this boils down to a terminology mismatch. The Arm architecture doesn't > > have > > anything called "write combine", so in Linux we instead provide what

Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: fix page attributes for dma_mmap_*

2019-08-06 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:45:03PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:08:54PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 08:48:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 11:38:03AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Handle SG length overflow better

2019-08-06 Thread Robin Murphy
Hi Joerg, On 06/08/2019 16:25, Joerg Roedel wrote: Hi Robin, On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: Since scatterlist dimensions are all unsigned ints, in the relatively rare cases where a device's max_segment_size is set to UINT_MAX, then the "cur_len + s_length <=

Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: fix page attributes for dma_mmap_*

2019-08-06 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:08:54PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 08:48:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 11:38:03AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > > > So this boils down to a terminology mismatch. The Arm architecture > > > doesn't have > >

Re: [PATCH 3/8] of/fdt: add function to get the SoC wide DMA addressable memory size

2019-08-06 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Hi Rob, On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 13:23 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:03 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne > wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > Thanks for the review! > > > > On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 11:17 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 9:48 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne > > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: fix page attributes for dma_mmap_*

2019-08-06 Thread Shawn Anastasio via iommu
On 8/5/19 10:01 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: diff --git a/include/linux/dma-noncoherent.h b/include/linux/dma-noncoherent.h index 3813211a9aad..9ae5cee543c4 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-noncoherent.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-noncoherent.h @@ -42,13 +42,8 @@ void arch_dma_free(struct device

Re: [PATCH] dma-direct: don't truncate dma_required_mask to bus addressing capabilities

2019-08-06 Thread Atish Patra
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 07:23 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 05:51:53PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > > The dma required_mask needs to reflect the actual addressing > > capabilities > > needed to handle the whole system RAM. When truncated down to the > > bus > > addressing

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 06/59] dma-mapping: check pfn validity in dma_common_{mmap, get_sgtable}

2019-08-06 Thread Sasha Levin
From: Christoph Hellwig [ Upstream commit 66d7780f18eae0232827fcffeaded39a6a168236 ] Check that the pfn returned from arch_dma_coherent_to_pfn refers to a valid page and reject the mmap / get_sgtable requests otherwise. Based on the arm implementation of the mmap and get_sgtable methods.

Re: [PATCH 4.19 17/32] iommu/vt-d: Dont queue_iova() if there is no flush queue

2019-08-06 Thread Dmitry Safonov via iommu
Hi Pavel, On 8/3/19 10:34 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c >> @@ -3721,7 +3721,7 @@ static void intel_unmap(struct device *d >> >> freelist = domain_unmap(domain, start_pfn, last_pfn); >> >> -if

[PATCH v3 hmm 00/11] Add mmu_notifier_get/put for managing mmu notifier registrations

2019-08-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe This series introduces a new registration flow for mmu_notifiers based on the idea that the user would like to get a single refcounted piece of memory for a mm, keyed to its use. For instance many users of mmu_notifiers use an interval tree or similar to dispatch

[PATCH v3 hmm 10/11] drm/amdkfd: use mmu_notifier_put

2019-08-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe The sequence of mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release(), mmu_notifier_call_srcu() is identical to mmu_notifier_put() with the free_notifier callback. As this is the last user of those APIs, converting it means we can drop them. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe ---

[PATCH v3 hmm 09/11] drm/amdkfd: fix a use after free race with mmu_notifer unregister

2019-08-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe When using mmu_notifer_unregister_no_release() the caller must ensure there is a SRCU synchronize before the mn memory is freed, otherwise use after free races are possible, for instance: CPU0 CPU1

[PATCH v3 hmm 05/11] hmm: use mmu_notifier_get/put for 'struct hmm'

2019-08-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe This is a significant simplification, it eliminates all the remaining 'hmm' stuff in mm_struct, eliminates krefing along the critical notifier paths, and takes away all the ugly locking and abuse of page_table_lock. mmu_notifier_get() provides the single struct hmm per

Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Handle SG length overflow better

2019-08-06 Thread Nicolin Chen
Hi Robin, On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 04:49:01PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > Hi Joerg, > > On 06/08/2019 16:25, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Hi Robin, > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > Since scatterlist dimensions are all unsigned ints, in the relatively > > >

[PATCH v3 hmm 03/11] mm/mmu_notifiers: add a get/put scheme for the registration

2019-08-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe Many places in the kernel have a flow where userspace will create some object and that object will need to connect to the subsystem's mmu_notifier subscription for the duration of its lifetime. In this case the subsystem is usually tracking multiple mm_structs and it is

[PATCH v3 hmm 07/11] RDMA/odp: remove ib_ucontext from ib_umem

2019-08-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe At this point the ucontext is only being stored to access the ib_device, so just store the ib_device directly instead. This is more natural and logical as the umem has nothing to do with the ucontext. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe --- drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c

[PATCH v3 hmm 06/11] RDMA/odp: use mmu_notifier_get/put for 'struct ib_ucontext_per_mm'

2019-08-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe This is a significant simplification, no extra list is kept per FD, and the interval tree is now shared between all the ucontexts, reducing overhead if there are multiple ucontexts active. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe --- drivers/infiniband/core/umem_odp.c| 170

[PATCH v3 hmm 02/11] mm/mmu_notifiers: do not speculatively allocate a mmu_notifier_mm

2019-08-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe A prior commit e0f3c3f78da2 ("mm/mmu_notifier: init notifier if necessary") made an attempt at doing this, but had to be reverted as calling the GFP_KERNEL allocator under the i_mmap_mutex causes deadlock, see commit 35cfa2b0b491 ("mm/mmu_notifier: allocate mmu_notifier in

[PATCH v3 hmm 11/11] mm/mmu_notifiers: remove unregister_no_release

2019-08-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release() and mmu_notifier_call_srcu() no longer have any users, they have all been converted to use mmu_notifier_put(). So delete this difficult to use interface. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe --- include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 5 -

[PATCH v3 hmm 01/11] mm/mmu_notifiers: hoist do_mmu_notifier_register down_write to the caller

2019-08-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe This simplifies the code to not have so many one line functions and extra logic. __mmu_notifier_register() simply becomes the entry point to register the notifier, and the other one calls it under lock. Also add a lockdep_assert to check that the callers are holding the

[PATCH v3 hmm 04/11] misc/sgi-gru: use mmu_notifier_get/put for struct gru_mm_struct

2019-08-06 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
From: Jason Gunthorpe GRU is already using almost the same algorithm as get/put, it even helpfully has a 10 year old comment to make this algorithm common, which is finally happening. There are a few differences and fixes from this conversion: - GRU used rcu not srcu to read the hlist - Unclear

Re: [PATCH 4.19 17/32] iommu/vt-d: Dont queue_iova() if there is no flush queue

2019-08-06 Thread Dmitry Safonov
On 8/6/19 11:47 PM, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > On 8/3/19 10:34 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c >>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c >>> @@ -3721,7 +3721,7 @@ static void intel_unmap(struct device *d >>> >>> freelist = domain_unmap(domain,

Re: [RFC,v3 7/9] media: platform: Add Mediatek ISP P1 device driver

2019-08-06 Thread Jungo Lin
Hi, Tomasz: On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 18:47 +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Jungo, > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 4:24 PM Jungo Lin wrote: > > > > Hi, Tomasz: > > > > On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 18:23 +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > .Hi Jungo, > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 6:58 PM Jungo Lin wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/vt-d: Apply per-device dma_ops

2019-08-06 Thread Lu Baolu
Hi Christoph, On 8/6/19 2:43 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Hi Lu, I really do like the switch to the per-device dma_map_ops, but: On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:01:55PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: Current Intel IOMMU driver sets the system level dma_ops. This implementation has at least the following

Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/vt-d: Apply per-device dma_ops

2019-08-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Hi Lu, I really do like the switch to the per-device dma_map_ops, but: On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:01:55PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Current Intel IOMMU driver sets the system level dma_ops. This > implementation has at least the following drawbacks: 1) each > dma API will go through the IOMMU

Re: [PATCH v2] iommu: revisit iommu_insert_resv_region() implementation

2019-08-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
A couple nitpicks below: On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 05:59:46PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > - * The new element is sorted by address with respect to the other > - * regions of the same type. In case it overlaps with another > - * region of the same type, regions are merged. In case it > - * overlaps

Re: Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)

2019-08-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:13:29AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > I just found a regression where my NVMe device is no longer able to set > up its HMB. > > After subject commit dma_direct_alloc_pages() is no longer initializing > dma_handle properly when DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING

Re: [PATCH 4/7] ALSA: pcm: use dma_can_mmap() to check if a device supports dma_mmap_*

2019-08-06 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Tue, 06 Aug 2019 07:29:49 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 11:22:03AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > This won't work as expected, unfortunately. It's a bit tricky check, > > since the driver may have its own mmap implementation via > > substream->ops->mmap, and the

Re: [RFC,v3 7/9] media: platform: Add Mediatek ISP P1 device driver

2019-08-06 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Jungo, On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 4:24 PM Jungo Lin wrote: > > Hi, Tomasz: > > On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 18:23 +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > .Hi Jungo, > > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 6:58 PM Jungo Lin wrote: > > > > > > Hi, Tomasz: > > > > > > On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 18:56 +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:

Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)

2019-08-06 Thread Lucas Stach
Hi Christoph, I just found a regression where my NVMe device is no longer able to set up its HMB. After subject commit dma_direct_alloc_pages() is no longer initializing dma_handle properly when DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING is set, as the function is now returning too early. Now this could easily

Re: Regression due to d98849aff879 (dma-direct: handle DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING in common code)

2019-08-06 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 06.08.2019, 13:33 +0200 schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:13:29AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > > > I just found a regression where my NVMe device is no longer able to > > set > > up its HMB. > > > > After subject commit