On 05/31/2016 08:15 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:54:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The dma-mapping core and the implementations do not change the
>> DMA attributes passed by pointer. Thus the pointer can point to const
>> data. However the attributes do
On 05/31/2016 07:04 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:54:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The dma-mapping core and the implementations do not change the
>> DMA attributes passed by pointer. Thus the pointer can point to const
>> data. However the attributes do not
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:54:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The dma-mapping core and the implementations do not change the
> DMA attributes passed by pointer. Thus the pointer can point to const
> data. However the attributes do not have to be a bitfield. Instead
> unsigned long will d
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 05:49:17PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
>> > index b55aa7
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > To get KFD support in radeon we need the following
> > initialization to happen in this order, their
> > respective driver file that has its init routine
> > listed next t
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 05:49:17PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
> > index b55aa740171f..1fa1b7f3a89c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rade
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:54:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The dma-mapping core and the implementations do not change the
> DMA attributes passed by pointer. Thus the pointer can point to const
> data. However the attributes do not have to be a bitfield. Instead
> unsigned long will d
On 31.05.2016 12:51, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 30/05/16 15:15, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
>> Currently, when initializing the CBAR memattr attributes to the weakest
>> values, it is expected that the final ones will be declared in the TTBCR
>> register (SMMU_CBn_TCR).
>
> You mean the stage 1 PTE, rig
On 30/05/16 15:15, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
Currently, when initializing the CBAR memattr attributes to the weakest
values, it is expected that the final ones will be declared in the TTBCR
register (SMMU_CBn_TCR).
You mean the stage 1 PTE, right? TTBCR only controls the attributes for
table wa
