2018-07-12 16:15 GMT+09:00 Christoph Hellwig :
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:48:47AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> One of existing user is general DMA layer and it takes gfp flags that is
>> provided by user. I don't check all the DMA allocation sites but how do
>> you convince that none of them try
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 09:34:30AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Do you have further comments for this series? I will work out a
> new version if there are no ones.
Not for now. Though since you mentioned about the work to remove the
pasid state table, not sure whether it'll be nice to
On 2018/7/13 9:48, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>
>
> On 2018/7/13 1:01, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 05:28:43PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>> Stream bypass is not security. A malicious device can be hot plugged
>>> without match any drivers, but it can access to any memory. So chan
On 2018/7/13 1:01, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 05:28:43PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>> Stream bypass is not security. A malicious device can be hot plugged
>> without match any drivers, but it can access to any memory. So change to
>> disable bypass by default.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
Hi Peter,
Do you have further comments for this series? I will work out a
new version if there are no ones.
Thank you for reviewing my patches. Do you allow me to add your
reviewed-by to the patches which you've reviewed?
Best regards,
Lu Baolu
On 07/11/2018 10:45 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 05:28:43PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Stream bypass is not security. A malicious device can be hot plugged
> without match any drivers, but it can access to any memory. So change to
> disable bypass by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
Hi Rafael,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Vivek Gautam
wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
>
>
> On 7/11/2018 3:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, July 8, 2018 7:34:12 PM CEST Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Sricharan R
>>>
>>> Finally add the device link between the master device and
>>> s
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:11 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Vivek Gautam
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Rafael,
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Sunday, Jul
Stream bypass is not security. A malicious device can be hot plugged
without match any drivers, but it can access to any memory. So change to
disable bypass by default.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/dri
Hi Robin,
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:36 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> ping??
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 6:45 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Robin,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
>>> w
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 05:56:40PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Indeed, once we've found an approach that everyone's happy with we can have
> a more thorough audit of exactly where else it needs to be applied. FWIW
> I'm not aware of any 32-bit Arm systems affected by this*, but if they do
> exi
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:48:47AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> One of existing user is general DMA layer and it takes gfp flags that is
> provided by user. I don't check all the DMA allocation sites but how do
> you convince that none of them try to use anything other
> than GFP_KERNEL [|__GFP_NOWA
12 matches
Mail list logo
