On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Robin Murphy robin.mur...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Will,
On 05/12/14 12:10, Will Deacon wrote:
[...]
Do you expect drivers to modify that *priv pointer after the ops
structure is registered? I'd be very surprised if that was the use
case. It's fine for the driver
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 01:06:52PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Robin Murphy robin.mur...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Will,
On 05/12/14 12:10, Will Deacon wrote:
[...]
Do you expect
Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 02 December 2014 14:16:57 Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
wrote:
+static inline void of_iommu_set_ops
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Robin Murphy robin.mur...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Arnd,
On 03/12/14 19:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
[...]
Good catch. This is not good. The data pointer should be avoided since
there are no controls over its use. Until a better solution can be
implemented, probably
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:25:35AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Thursday 04 December 2014 10:21:27 Will Deacon wrote:
Sure, I'll add this to my list
pointer in the DT node is public and may be overwritten
by conflicting code, move the DT-probed IOMMU ops to a private list
where they will be safe.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy robin.mur...@arm.com
Acked-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org
---
drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 40
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
Adding Grant and Pantelis...
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
IOMMU drivers must be initialised before any of their upstream devices,
otherwise the relevant iommu_ops won't be
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:33:38 +0100, Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org wrote @ Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:28:45
+0100:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:57:00 -0700, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 11/21/2013 10:17 AM, Hiroshi Doyu
.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com
Acked-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org
This patch can be merged with the rest of the series.
g.
---
v6+:
Use the description, which Grant Likely proposed, to be full enough
that a future reader can figure out why a patch was written.
http
of_property_for_each_phandle_with_args() macro to make the iteration
simpler.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com
---
v6+:
Use the description, which Grant Likely proposed, to be full enough
that a future reader can figure out why a patch was written.
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:12:18 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:43:28 +0100
Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:33:05 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com wrote:
The following pattern of code is tempting:
for (i = 0
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:33:05 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com wrote:
The following pattern of code is tempting:
for (i = 0; !of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args); i++)
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com
That's a very minimal commit message. Can you elaborate
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:04:18 -0700, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 11/21/2013 06:15 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:33:06 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com wrote:
IOMMU devices on the bus need to be poplulated first, then iommu
master devices are done
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:58:58 -0600, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 10/25/2013 03:11 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
So my proposed solution for the IOMMU case is to treat it the same
as any other resources. Perhaps resource isn't the right word, but
at the core the issue is
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:31:34 +0100, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:01:36PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:49:38 +0200, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:49:05AM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 04:36:30 -0500, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Oct 24, 2013, at 4:21 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Hi Grant,
Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org wrote @ Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:55:31
+0200:
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:49:38 +0200, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:49:05AM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote @ Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:11:05
+0200:
This is actually the other problem that I'm aware of that
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012 13:35:10 +0200, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
* Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:42:58 +0200, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Hi,
I have a device tree where I have a GART device and a DRM device which
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:42:58 +0200, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Hi,
I have a device tree where I have a GART device and a DRM device which uses
the GART. The GART is implemented by an IOMMU driver (tegra-gart) and
requires the user device to be a child of the GART
19 matches
Mail list logo
