On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:46:59PM +0100, Stuart Yoder wrote:
So, whilst it's great that you're looking at the code, I'm not very
keen on
merging anything until we have people committed to using it. Right now,
the
only feedback I've had has been going in the para-virt
-Original Message-
From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 11:18 AM
To: Sethi Varun-B16395
Cc: Baptiste Reynal; Linux IOMMU; Yoder Stuart-B08248
Subject: Re: SMMU 2-stage support
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:32:26PM +0100, Varun Sethi wrote
Reynal
Cc: Linux IOMMU
Subject: Re: SMMU 2-stage support
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:55:02AM +0100, Baptiste Reynal wrote:
We are eventually working on the vSMMU implementation. Relying on the
talk Will Deacon gave at the Linux Plumbers IOMMU Microconference on
October
2014 (http
Hi Will,
-Original Message-
From: iommu-boun...@lists.linux-foundation.org [mailto:iommu-
boun...@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Will Deacon
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 4:11 PM
To: Baptiste Reynal
Cc: Linux IOMMU
Subject: Re: SMMU 2-stage support
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:55:02AM +0100, Baptiste Reynal wrote:
We are eventually working on the vSMMU implementation. Relying on the talk
Will Deacon gave at the Linux Plumbers IOMMU Microconference on October
2014 (http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2014/ocw/proposals/2019), I tried the
vSMMU
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 05:04:21PM +, Baptiste Reynal wrote:
We are currently working on the ARM SMMU 2-stage support in order to
expose SMMU capabilities to a guest OS.
By doing some research, we noticed some work has already be done by Will
Deacon on exposing virtual IOMMU interface to
