Swami.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20161018/39550bc8/attachment.html>
due normal . Why it's failed ? I
doesn't has any idea , Look forward for your help !
Thank you for your patience !
BR,
xiaoyan
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20161018/ba709
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20161018/5a52b29a/attachment.html>
Hello,
I realize that everybody is running pretty hard at getting 1.2.0 out,
and I'm not sure how far that might be still (day to day?).
I've tested the current git branches as well as the fixes for the
gtest issue I've received in IRC and mailing list, and they work
(so 1.2.0-rc4, 1.2-rel,
On 18/10/16 16:07, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I realize that everybody is running pretty hard at getting 1.2.0 out,
> and I'm not sure how far that might be still (day to day?).
>
> I've tested the current git branches as well as the fixes for the
> gtest issue I've received in IRC and
HTML ?? ??...
URL:
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20161018/30070e34/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ?? ?? .
Type: image/gif
Size: 13402 byte
hi
i am working with iotivity 1.1.0.i am trying to use ipv6 insted of
ipv4.for testing i am using simpleclient and simpleserver codes.i
tried to use alternate structure for PlatformConfig i.e
PlatformConfig cfg(OC::ServiceType::InProc,
OC::ModeType::Server,
, and arm64-v8a)?
Just asking so I know what to develop/test against.
George
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20161018/59668321/attachment.html>
On 10/18/2016 07:24 AM, Phil Coval wrote:
>
>
> On 18/10/16 16:07, Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I realize that everybody is running pretty hard at getting 1.2.0 out,
>> and I'm not sure how far that might be still (day to day?).
>>
>> I've tested the current git branches as well as the