[Ipmitool-devel] IPMI lanplus connection and Cipher Suite IDs

2009-05-26 Thread Bernard Manjou
Hi all, I have some trouble with the use of Cipher Suite IDs for IPMI lanplus connection. On some systems, specially Supermicro systems, I can't use any Cipher ID except -C 0 Lan configuration of this server running IPMI 2.0 is: RMCP+ Cipher Suites : 0,1,2,3,6,7,8,11,12 Cipher Suite Priv Max

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] Accessing IPMB slave device sensors from otherchannels than IPMB

2009-01-26 Thread Bernard Manjou
Hi Mirko, I agree with you and I included this interface check removal in my patch proposal titled "Patch proposal for sensors owned by satellite controllers". Moreover, can anyone tell me in which case the interface name (intf->name) is set to "ipmb". Bernard. > -Message d'origine- >

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] Optimizing the use of ipmitool

2008-11-26 Thread Bernard Manjou
Did you try 'ipmitool -S file exec cmdfile' Bernard > -Message d'origine- > De : Mark Seger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : 26 November 2008 15:19 > À : Isabelle, Francois > Cc : ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Carol Hebert > Objet : Re: [Ipmitool-devel] Optimizing the use o

[Ipmitool-devel] Ipmitool-1.8.10: Problem on Front Panel Button status

2008-11-13 Thread Bernard Manjou
Hi All, The "ipmitool chassis status" returns bad "Front Panel Button disable/enable status". The reason is the use of erroneous mask values. The attached patch fixes this problem. Bernard MANJOU diff -Naur ipmitool-1.8.10/lib/ipmi_chassis.c ipmitool-1.8.10_patc

[Ipmitool-devel] Add on of BULL IANA number to IPMI_OEM list

2008-07-18 Thread Bernard Manjou
"Bull Company" }, { 0x , NULL }, }; Thanks, ======= Bernard MANJOU System Software Development R&D phone : +33 (0) 1 30 80 73 50 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bull, Architect of an Open World TM http:

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.10 - Fifth/final patch batch (35)Patch proposal

2008-07-11 Thread Bernard Manjou
correspond to a timestamp equal to 0, which is not the final timestamp of this event that appears correctly on an "ipmitool sel list" command. Hope this help you Bernard. > -Message d'origine- > De : Carol Hebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.10 - Fifth/final patch batch (35)Patch proposal

2008-06-30 Thread Bernard Manjou
elta_hour=lt_hour - gt_hour; + if ( (lt_year > gt_year) || ((lt_year == gt_year) && (lt_yday > gt_yday)) ) + delta_hour += 24; + if ( (lt_year < gt_year) || ((lt_year == gt_year) && (lt_yday < gt_yday)) ) + delta_hour

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.10 - Fourth patch batch

2008-06-18 Thread Bernard Manjou
7, Ben Bloom describes an issue he's seeing > getting sensor readings on a non-ipmb implementation. Ben, > did Holger's 11/4 workaround suggestion help? > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=BE5503 2BAC1C8441B01E9EF7CE57CC20A8EDCE%40OREXCHANGE01.radisys.com

[Ipmitool-devel] Problem with identical Sensor numbers or FRU numbers

2008-06-17 Thread Bernard Manjou
fru ..." commands with fru_id argument. If you agree with this analysis, my feeling is that an optional argument (ie:called "owner_id"), set by default to 0x20, should be added to ipmitool commands with fru_id or sensor_id argument, and this "owner_id" parameter should be adde

[Ipmitool-devel] Ipmitool and timestamps

2008-06-12 Thread Bernard Manjou
assumes timestamp is specified in UTC time before converting it in Local time for display. The problem occurs when sel time has been set in local time (compliantly to IPMI spec) by an external tool. May be my understanding of IPMI spec is wrong? In the other case, should not Ipmitool

[Ipmitool-devel] PATCH proposal for Sensors owned by satellite controlers

2008-06-10 Thread Bernard Manjou
be added to ipmi_sdr_find_sdr_byid() and all calling codes should also be modified.) === Bernard MANJOU System Software Development R&D phone : +33 (0) 1 30 80 73 50 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bull, Architect of an Open Worl

[Ipmitool-devel] PATCH proposal for printing of discrete sensor states

2008-05-28 Thread Bernard Manjou
if ((1 << (evt->offset - 8)) & state2) { + if ((1 << (evt->offset - 8)) & (state2 & 0x7f)) { if (evt->desc) {

[Ipmitool-devel] PATCH proposal for i2c Master Write-Read command

2008-05-28 Thread Bernard Manjou
v[i], NULL, 0); - wdata[i-2] = val; + wdata[wsize] = val; wsize++; } Thanks, Bernard MANJOU - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Stud

[Ipmitool-devel] PATCH proposal for returning of SDR Repository Free Space

2008-05-28 Thread Bernard Manjou
free_space = - (sdr_repository_info.free_space[0] << 8) | - sdr_repository_info.free_space[1]; + (sdr_repository_info.free_space[1] << 8) | + sdr_repository_info.free_space[0]; printf("Free Space : "); switc

[Ipmitool-devel] IPMI timestamps: GMT or local time

2008-04-21 Thread Bernard Manjou
Hi all, IPMI spec 2.0 specifies that "Timestamps used for SDR and SEL records are assumed to be specified in local time". But "ipmitool sel set time" command sets the IPMI SEL clock with GMT time and all SDR and SEL ipmitool commands assumed IPMI timestamps to be in GMT time. Is ipmitool correct