This back and forth was brought to mind when looking at a recent paper, which
said in the abstract:
Our results show that the level of politeness in the communication
process among developers does have an e ect on the time required to x issues
and, in the majority of the analysed proje
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Jordan Hargrave
wrote:
>>> Ah well that makes things much easier! Would something like ipmitool pef
>>> policy and ipmitool pef policy be OK?
>>>
>>
>> You mean to tell me the whole code review was for nothing? That you've
>> deliberately wasted my time? And now yo
> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 19:09:35 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] [PATCH] New PEF policy framework
> From: zdenek.styb...@gmail.com
> To: jordan_hargr...@hotmail.com
> CC: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; p...@sgi.com
>
> O
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:21 PM, hotmail wrote:
>
>
>> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:49:08 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] [PATCH] New PEF policy framework
>> From: zdenek.styb...@gmail.com
>> To: jordan_hargr...@hotmail.com
>> CC: ipmitool-devel@lists.source
Thank you for the heads up - this change to selectively enable/disable
policy table entries is good for SGI too.
Best regards,
Pat
On 9/2/2015 11:21 AM, hotmail wrote:
>
>> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:49:08 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] [PATCH] New PEF policy fr
> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:49:08 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] [PATCH] New PEF policy framework
> From: zdenek.styb...@gmail.com
> To: jordan_hargr...@hotmail.com
> CC: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; p...@sgi.com
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Jor
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Jordan Hargrave
wrote:
> Some time ago I proposed a patch to enable enabling/disabling individual PEF
> policy entries.
> Support for this is needed for one of our utilities. A new rework of the
> whole PEF framework was
> requested. I'm attaching a patch that
Some time ago I proposed a patch to enable enabling/disabling individual PEF
policy entries.
Support for this is needed for one of our utilities. A new rework of the whole
PEF framework was
requested. I'm attaching a patch that (partially) implements this new scheme,
please review.
http://sou
