[Ipmitool-devel] Doubt on ipmitool implementation

hello All, I am a newbie on ipmitool. During my study on ipmitool, i came across libipmi which provides interface to bmc. My understanding is that i can use libipmi interfaces to received sdr information (Like fan speed etc). If i am wrong, please correct me. When i was going through the cod

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] Doubt on ipmitool implementation

mi.sourceforge.net) and freeipmi >(http://www.gnu.org/software/freeipmi) libraries. I'm the author of OpenIPMI, >so that's my preference, but freeipmi is fine. The only thing to be careful >of (as with all free software) is that you comply with the licenses, as >fre

[Ipmitool-devel] DIMM and EEPROM sizes

p0.d1.fru as input and get DIMM size as output? Thanks & Regards Amit Kumar - SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainst

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] DIMM and EEPROM sizes

r system, for instance, >that has all this except DIMMs that don't have the proper SPD tie-ins. So >they time out when I access them. > >-corey > >Amit Kumar wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >>How can i retrieve DIMM sizes and EEPROM sizes using ipmitool.

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] DIMM and EEPROM sizes

hanks Amit On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 Corey Minyard wrote : >Amit Kumar wrote: >> >> Hi Corey, >> >>I have verified that DIMM SPD is properly tied to BMC I2C. >>Could you think of any other reason ? >> >>Thanks, &g

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] DIMM and EEPROM sizes

y >suggestion on the best route to go. > >-corey > >Amit Kumar wrote: >> >> When i try - >>ipmitool -I bmc fru >> >>I get output something like - >> >>FRU Device Description : p1.d0.fru (ID 12) >>Product Manufacturer : SAMSUNG &g

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] DIMM and EEPROM sizes

Minyard wrote : >I think in my last email that I said that the data seems to be correct >and ipmitool does not seem to be doing the right thing. I'd suggest >doing a patch to ipmitool and submitting it to the mailing list. > >-corey > >Amit Kumar wrote: > > > > &

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] Strange problems on IBM x3455.

Hi Massimo, Did you used the raw interface? Is your command looks like - ipmitool -vI lan -H -U root raw 0x6 0x2 Thanks Amit On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 Massimo Gaggero wrote : >Hi, > I'm using ipmitool on IBM x3455 machines. It works well, until I >send to BMC the command >'bmc reset cold'. Af

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] Strange problems on IBM x3455.

, then it means , it works fine. Regards Amit On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 Massimo Gaggero wrote : >Ok, If I try the command: ># ipmitool -v raw 0x6 0x2 >RAW REQ (channel=0x0 netfn=0x6 lun=0x0 cmd=0x2 data_len=0) >RAW RSP (0 bytes) > ># >it returns a blank line... not good, I suppose...

[Ipmitool-devel] Doubt on GENERIC Locator Records

appears that 'ok' shown in the last is always printed. How can i retrieve the value of p0.d0.fail.led as it is not shown in full sensor and compact sensor records? Any clues? Thanks & Regards Amit Kumar - This S

[Ipmitool-devel] Fwd: Doubt on GENERIC Locator Records

Hello All, Any clues on this? Thanks Amit Note: Forwarded message attached -- Original Message -- From: "Amit Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Ipmitool-devel] Doubt on GENERIC Locator Records --- Begin Message --- Hello All, I a