Re: [IPsec] TSVDIR-ish review ofdraft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-04

2013-10-22 Thread Paul Wouters
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Valery Smyslov wrote: attacks (e.g., overloading the receiver with false fragments). This attack is always possible both with and without fragmentation (just overloading with false full messages) and IKE is designed to withstand it. Partially. For unfragmented IKE, the

Re: [IPsec] TSVDIR-ish review ofdraft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-04

2013-10-22 Thread Joe Touch
Hi, Valery, On 10/22/2013 5:50 AM, Valery Smyslov wrote: Hi Joe, thank you for your review. Please, see my comments inline. Hi, all, I've reviewed the following doc for TSVDIR: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-04 Although this is not intended as a complete TSVDIR review, I have checke

Re: [IPsec] FWD from Cao Zhen \(CZ\): [Lwip] WGLC for I-Ddraft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal-01.txt

2013-10-22 Thread Valery Smyslov
HI Tero, one editorial error, copied from RFC5996: on Page 22, in the description of Next Payload, the sentence In the header of an Encrypted payload, the Next Payload field is set to the payload type of the first contained payload (instead of 0); conversely, the Next Payload fie

Re: [IPsec] TSVDIR-ish review ofdraft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-04

2013-10-22 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Joe, thank you for your review. Please, see my comments inline. Hi, all, I've reviewed the following doc for TSVDIR: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation-04 Although this is not intended as a complete TSVDIR review, I have checked for the typical issues. Joe -