Re: [IPsec] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-30 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > On 30/08/16 19:55, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: >> I'll leave this text alone from the WG response, at least for now. >> Being able to work on it in months makes sense even if it isn't the >> best long term

Re: [IPsec] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-30 Thread Stephen Farrell
On 30/08/16 19:55, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > I'll leave this text alone from the WG response, at least for now. > Being able to work on it in months makes sense even if it isn't the > best long term solution. I'm ok with that. But note that my suggested wording is not meant to commit the WG to

Re: [IPsec] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-30 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > >> -- >> COMMENT: >> -- >> >> This sentence

Re: [IPsec] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-30 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for > charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and

Re: [IPsec] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-30 Thread Yoav Nir
Hi, Stephen > On 30 Aug 2016, at 4:38 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > I have a suggestion about this bit of work: > > "IKEv1 using shared secret authentication was partially resistance to > quantum computers. IKEv2 removed this feature to make the protocol > more

[IPsec] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: (with COMMENT)

2016-08-30 Thread Stephen Farrell
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-ipsecme-10-00: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with

Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves-04.txt

2016-08-30 Thread Yoav Nir
Just an updated reference. Yoav > On 30 Aug 2016, at 12:23 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions of > the IETF. > >Title

[IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves-04.txt

2016-08-30 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions of the IETF. Title : Curve25519 and Curve448 for IKEv2 Key Agreement Authors : Yoav Nir