On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 5:17 AM Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Paul Wouters writes:
> > See
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters/ikev2-parameters.xhtml#ikev2-parameters-5
> >
> > I noticed that the IKEv2 column for AES_GCM variants mentions RFC
> > 8247. This should be RFC 8221. And for
Paul Wouters writes:
>In addition, IANA has added this RFC as a reference to both the ESP
>Reference and IKEv2 Reference columns for ENCR_AES_GCM entries, while
>keeping the existing references there. Also, IANA has added this RFC
>as a reference to the ESP Reference column for
Paul Wouters writes:
> See
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters/ikev2-parameters.xhtml#ikev2-parameters-5
>
> I noticed that the IKEv2 column for AES_GCM variants mentions RFC
> 8247. This should be RFC 8221. And for AES_CCM, the ESP and IKEv2
> columns are missing the RFC
Daniel Migault writes:
> Thanks for the comments, this matches how we envisioned to update the draft,
> except that we envisioned the responder sends a N(DSCP) and that we also
> indicated the support of the N(DSCP). I think you recommend not to have these
> two notifications, which could work for
