Re: [IPsec] [Schc] WG Adoption calls for draft-mglt-ipsecme-diet-esp and draft-mglt-ipsecme-ikev2-diet-esp-extension

2023-12-11 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 2023-12-11, at 13:11, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > > @Carsten: I have not been following the ROHC work after standardization > was completed. Was it actually used? Is it still used? Hi Hannes, last I looked, ROHC was in wide use in 3GPP environments, probably mostly in conjunction with IMS.

Re: [IPsec] WG Adoption calls for draft-mglt-ipsecme-diet-esp and draft-mglt-ipsecme-ikev2-diet-esp-extension

2023-11-30 Thread Carsten Bormann
As a co-author of draft-mglt-ipsecme-diet-esp, I do support this work (as well as the accompanying draft-mglt-ipsecme-ikev2-diet-esp-extension) and plan to continue working on it. We did the equivalent of these two drafts for ROHC in RFC 5856 to 5858. The current work is an obvious missing link

Re: [IPsec] [6lo] Diet-ESP

2014-07-27 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 25.07.2014, at 12:26, Stephen Kent k...@bbn.com wrote: Is it clear that the cycles vs. bandwidth tradeoff is always a win? Practically always. Daniel's numbers were spot on. Grüße, Carsten ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org