Michael Rossberg wrote:
>>> I think that a way to negotiate this is as if it was unique cipher.
>>
>> BTW: I recognize that this might require a new value for each cipher.
>>
>> As such, it's not a great long term solution, but I would claim that it
>> probably applies to
Hi,
>
>> I think that a way to negotiate this is as if it was unique cipher.
>
> BTW: I recognize that this might require a new value for each cipher.
>
> As such, it's not a great long term solution, but I would claim that it
> probably applies to a few ciphers very specifically at first.
>
>
Michael Richardson wrote:
> Hi, I finally got to watching your presentation on the IETF youtube
channel.
> the illustration at https://youtu.be/IrNsFAPhx-Q?t=3410, which I guess is
> also at:
>
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-ipsecme-proposed-improvements-
Hi, I finally got to watching your presentation on the IETF youtube
channel. the illustration at https://youtu.be/IrNsFAPhx-Q?t=3410, which
I guess is also at:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-ipsecme-proposed-improvements-to-esp-01
slide 3.
It is unfortunate that the y
