I agree. The point I wanted to make is that multicore can be made for both
in ESPv3 and in ESPv4 so we do not wait for ESPv4 to handle multicore. The
two mechanisms may be slightly different but I expect some commonalities.
As a result, I expect early deployments on ESPv3 may provide some
useful
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 05:16:08PM -0500, Daniel Migault wrote:
> I support Bob's suggestion.
> I also believe that multicore will be addressed by design. I do want to
> have some mechanisms like [1] to be included by design. That said, I would
> like [1] to start on ESPv3 and take the output back
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 04:15:54PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> speaking with no hats on.
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 7:47 AM Steffen Klassert <
> steffen.klass...@secunet.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there interest in doing a virtual interim to discuss an ESP re-design?
> >
>
> I am very interested.
I support Bob's suggestion.
I also believe that multicore will be addressed by design. I do want to
have some mechanisms like [1] to be included by design. That said, I would
like [1] to start on ESPv3 and take the output back to ESPv-4 as opposed to
waiting for ESP-v4.
Interims are free, we can
Paul Wouters wrote:
>> - How should the problems be solved?
>>
> Once we have a list, I think we can come up with plans to tweak ESP to
> tick off our list items.
> I do think we need some short presentations for an interim. Just having
> a free flow discussion will
speaking as individual,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 3:28 PM Michael Richardson
wrote:
>
> I don't think that the constrained problems are really a good mix at all
> into
> a higher-performance ESP. We are talking about 10 to 12 orders of
> magnitude
> difference in network performance.
>
I
speaking with no hats on.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 7:47 AM Steffen Klassert <
steffen.klass...@secunet.com> wrote:
> Is there interest in doing a virtual interim to discuss an ESP re-design?
>
I am very interested. It is a problem that we should fix sooner rather
than later.
First things
I don't think that the constrained problems are really a good mix at all into
a higher-performance ESP. We are talking about 10 to 12 orders of magnitude
difference in network performance.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and
I want to add support of constrained communications and taking diet-esp
to the next step as we work in lpwan with SCHC as a protocol.
The low byte overhead of DTLS makes it very attractive in constrained
communications. How can we best pair SCHC with ESP for efficient use of
limited
Steffen Klassert wrote:
> at the last working group meeting in London, it was quite some interest
> to work on a re-design of ESP to make it fit to the multi-cpu case, QoS
> classes, HW offloads etc.
I agree with your idea in the subject, of a virtual interim on this.
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
