Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-00.txt

2016-06-28 Thread Tommy Pauly
Hello, We've posted a new version of the TCP Encapsulation draft, now as a WG document (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-00). Here are the major changes in this version, based on the last round of feedback: - Changed most references to IKEv2 to IKE to make this

Re: [IPsec] Call for adoption on draft-fluhrer-qr-ikev2 as an IPSecME WG document

2016-06-28 Thread Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
This has been a good discussion so far. There is work to be done to address the issues raised. Getting back to the call for adoption, I'd like to see feedback on the following questions to better understand where consensus is on this issue. 1) Previous WG discussions have indicated interest in

Re: [IPsec] Call for adoption on draft-fluhrer-qr-ikev2 as an IPSecMEWG document

2016-06-28 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi, I support adopting this document. I think we need to have a PQ-secure solution in IPsec. I'd like to see it generic enough and not limiting to QKD technology only. I'd also like to have IKE SA to be protected, as well as Child SAs, so that this solution can be used in cases when sensitive