Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) writes:
> Waiting for your IKEv2 quantum resistance slides to become
> available, as a great summary of the potential requirements.
All the slides we presented in the IPsecME meeting was uploaded to the
meeting materials site before the meeting started, i.e.,
+1
Tero,
Waiting for your IKEv2 quantum resistance slides to become available, as a
great summary of the potential requirements.
-Original Message-
From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tero Kivinen
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 12:56 PM
To: Valery Smyslov
Valery Smyslov writes:
> > - Add Quantum Resistance for IKEv2 as new work item with milestone as
> > Feb 2017 for IETF LC.
>
> This milestone looks a bit optimistic for me.
> Otherwise the updated chapter looks good.
The limited resistance we are talking about is in the same level of
> -Original Message-
> From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tommy Pauly
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 12:25 PM
> To: Valery Smyslov
> Cc: ipsec@ietf.org; Tero Kivinen
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] New charter proposal
>
>
> > On Jul 20, 2016, at 5:12 PM, Valery Smyslov
If needed we could have some virtual meetings between IETF 96, 97, and 98 to
work through issues. This could help increase bandwidth to make these
milestones.
Dave
Original Message
From: Tommy Pauly
Date: Wed, July 20, 2016 6:25 PM +0200
To: Valery Smyslov
> On Jul 20, 2016, at 5:12 PM, Valery Smyslov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>> - Add Quantum Resistance for IKEv2 as new work item with milestone as
>> Feb 2017 for IETF LC.
>
> This milestone looks a bit optimistic for me. Otherwise the updated chapter
> looks good.
The issue seems
Looks good to me as well. Thanks!
Tommy
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 20, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jul 20, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>>
>> As we discussed in the meeting yesterday, we need to
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 20, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
> As we discussed in the meeting yesterday, we need to update the
> charter and we are making following changes to it:
Looks good
Paul
___
IPsec mailing list
As we discussed in the meeting yesterday, we need to update the
charter and we are making following changes to it:
- Removing the opportunistic use case as null authentication has
already been published as RFC7619.
- Keep the DDoS case, but change the milestone from Mar 2016 to Aug
2016 for
Here is the meeting minutes from the IETF 96 session. Thanks for the
Adam for taking the minutes, and Yoav for the jabber scribing.
--
Getting started. Notetaker (Adam Montville). Jabber: Yoav Nir.
IPSECME DDOS Protection -
Yes, this looks good! I think both RFCs in the columns makes sense. I agree
that this looks ready for WGLC.
Tommy
> On Jul 20, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
>> In the end I think the best option would be to just include
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Tero Kivinen wrote:
In the end I think the best option would be to just include both RFCs
in the references column, i.e. make the final table to be something
like this:
Number Name ESP Reference IKEv2 Reference
...
18 ENCR_AES_GCM_8
I submitted new version of the rfc4307bis draft, which includes
following changes:
Changed ENCR_AES_CBC from MUST- to MUST. The WG meeting was in favor
of doing this change, and if you are against this change, say so
now...
Added the IANA considerations section to rename the AES-GCM with an/a
x
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions of the
IETF.
Title : Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage
Guidance for IKEv2
Authors : Yoav Nir
14 matches
Mail list logo