Re: [IPsec] New charter proposal

2016-07-20 Thread Tero Kivinen
Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) writes: > Waiting for your IKEv2 quantum resistance slides to become > available, as a great summary of the potential requirements. All the slides we presented in the IPsecME meeting was uploaded to the meeting materials site before the meeting started, i.e.,

Re: [IPsec] New charter proposal

2016-07-20 Thread Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
+1 Tero, Waiting for your IKEv2 quantum resistance slides to become available, as a great summary of the potential requirements. -Original Message- From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tero Kivinen Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 12:56 PM To: Valery Smyslov

Re: [IPsec] New charter proposal

2016-07-20 Thread Tero Kivinen
Valery Smyslov writes: > > - Add Quantum Resistance for IKEv2 as new work item with milestone as > > Feb 2017 for IETF LC. > > This milestone looks a bit optimistic for me. > Otherwise the updated chapter looks good. The limited resistance we are talking about is in the same level of

Re: [IPsec] New charter proposal

2016-07-20 Thread Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
> -Original Message- > From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tommy Pauly > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 12:25 PM > To: Valery Smyslov > Cc: ipsec@ietf.org; Tero Kivinen > Subject: Re: [IPsec] New charter proposal > > > > On Jul 20, 2016, at 5:12 PM, Valery Smyslov

Re: [IPsec] New charter proposal

2016-07-20 Thread Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
If needed we could have some virtual meetings between IETF 96, 97, and 98 to work through issues. This could help increase bandwidth to make these milestones. Dave Original Message From: Tommy Pauly Date: Wed, July 20, 2016 6:25 PM +0200 To: Valery Smyslov

Re: [IPsec] New charter proposal

2016-07-20 Thread Tommy Pauly
> On Jul 20, 2016, at 5:12 PM, Valery Smyslov wrote: > > Hi, >> - Add Quantum Resistance for IKEv2 as new work item with milestone as >> Feb 2017 for IETF LC. > > This milestone looks a bit optimistic for me. Otherwise the updated chapter > looks good. The issue seems

Re: [IPsec] New charter proposal

2016-07-20 Thread Tommy Pauly
Looks good to me as well. Thanks! Tommy Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 20, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jul 20, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote: >> >> As we discussed in the meeting yesterday, we need to

Re: [IPsec] New charter proposal

2016-07-20 Thread Paul Wouters
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 20, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote: > > As we discussed in the meeting yesterday, we need to update the > charter and we are making following changes to it: Looks good Paul ___ IPsec mailing list

[IPsec] New charter proposal

2016-07-20 Thread Tero Kivinen
As we discussed in the meeting yesterday, we need to update the charter and we are making following changes to it: - Removing the opportunistic use case as null authentication has already been published as RFC7619. - Keep the DDoS case, but change the milestone from Mar 2016 to Aug 2016 for

[IPsec] Minutes of the IPsecME in IETF 96

2016-07-20 Thread Tero Kivinen
Here is the meeting minutes from the IETF 96 session. Thanks for the Adam for taking the minutes, and Yoav for the jabber scribing. -- Getting started. Notetaker (Adam Montville). Jabber: Yoav Nir. IPSECME DDOS Protection -

Re: [IPsec] New version of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-10.txt

2016-07-20 Thread Tommy Pauly
Yes, this looks good! I think both RFCs in the columns makes sense. I agree that this looks ready for WGLC. Tommy > On Jul 20, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Tero Kivinen wrote: > >> In the end I think the best option would be to just include

Re: [IPsec] New version of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-10.txt

2016-07-20 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Tero Kivinen wrote: In the end I think the best option would be to just include both RFCs in the references column, i.e. make the final table to be something like this: Number Name ESP Reference IKEv2 Reference ... 18 ENCR_AES_GCM_8

[IPsec] New version of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-10.txt

2016-07-20 Thread Tero Kivinen
I submitted new version of the rfc4307bis draft, which includes following changes: Changed ENCR_AES_CBC from MUST- to MUST. The WG meeting was in favor of doing this change, and if you are against this change, say so now... Added the IANA considerations section to rename the AES-GCM with an/a x

[IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-10.txt

2016-07-20 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions of the IETF. Title : Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage Guidance for IKEv2 Authors : Yoav Nir