Some other bike shed colours
IKE_INIT_C - Init Continued
IKE_INIT2
IKE_BE - Blob Exchange, Bulk Exchange
IKE_LARGE
IKE_BULK
IKE_BIG_KE
IKE_LARGE_KE
I think IKE_SA_INIT is misnamed and should have been IKE_INIT,
or IKE_AUTH should have been IKE_SA_AUTH :)
I don't like IKE_CONT[INUE] because
I think IKE_SUPP is better compare to what have mentioned
-Original Message-
From: IPsec On Behalf Of CJ Tjhai
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 1:29 PM
To: tpa...@apple.com
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org; Valery Smyslov
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Rename IKE_AUX?
How about IKE_SUP or IKE_SUPP (for
How about IKE_SUP or IKE_SUPP (for IKE_SUPPLEMENTARY)?
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 21:14, Tommy Pauly wrote:
>
> I agree that IKE_AUX can be easily confused with IKE_AUTH. Similarly, IKE_INT
> looks a lot like the INIT from IKE_SA_INIT.
>
> I don't necessarily love IKE_PRE_AUTH, but it still seems
I agree that IKE_AUX can be easily confused with IKE_AUTH. Similarly, IKE_INT
looks a lot like the INIT from IKE_SA_INIT.
I don't necessarily love IKE_PRE_AUTH, but it still seems preferable to the
other options. You could also spell out "intermediate" to have
IKE_INTERMEDIATE. This is still
Hi,
I'm going to update IKE_AUX draft (in particular - change the way
it is authenticated based on recent discussion with Scott).
I recall that there were some complaints that the name IKE_AUX
is not good because it can easily be mixed up with IKE_AUTH
Actually, the phonetically close name was
