[With chair hat on]
Yes, the charter says that we are to make a guidance document. If the working
group feels that it’s better to put the specification and guidance in a single
document, we can work on that and clear it with the ADs.
Charters can be modified.
Yoav
> On 29 Apr 2020, at
Hi Tommy,
> Hi Valery,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up again. Would you be interested in making this
an
> RFC8229bis instead? I think it would be most useful for an implementer to
fold
> some of these clarifications into the main text itself. How do you feel
about
> that?
I'd be happy to do it.
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Tommy Pauly wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up again. Would you be interested in making this an
RFC8229bis instead? I think it would be most useful for an implementer to fold
some of these clarifications into the main text itself. How do you feel about
that?
That might
Hi Valery,
Thanks for bringing this up again. Would you be interested in making this an
RFC8229bis instead? I think it would be most useful for an implementer to fold
some of these clarifications into the main text itself. How do you feel about
that?
Best,
Tommy
> On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:54
