Hi,
I support the adoption of this draft.
I've read the very early version and thought it was quite useful.
I've read it again and still believe it's important and useful. I believe we're
highly likely to implement this draft.
Some quick comments below:
1) I feel the title "Alternate
On Dec 11, 2023, at 12:03, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:I have, however, heard about uses of WireGuard on Linux-based IoT
devices (these are non-constrained devices, obviously) with the
argument that it is simple to use and efficient.It’s actually far less efficient because it only
On 2023-12-11, at 13:11, Hannes Tschofenig
wrote:
>
> @Carsten: I have not been following the ROHC work after standardization
> was completed. Was it actually used? Is it still used?
Hi Hannes,
last I looked, ROHC was in wide use in 3GPP environments, probably mostly in
conjunction with IMS.
Hi Daniel, Hi all,
don't get me wrong: I am trying to be helpful.
Integrating the functionality into SCHC alone is not enough. You need to
integrate it into an implementation of IKEv2/IPsec that is suitable to
the mentioned constrained IoT use cases. I have not seen IPsec/IKEv2
being used in
Hi Paul,
Please find my comments inline.
Yours,
Daniel
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 9:59 AM Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2023, at 08:53, Daniel Migault wrote:
> >
> >
> > What is not completely clear to me now is how we will be able to
> have/make public implementations for linux
>
> On Dec 11, 2023, at 08:53, Daniel Migault wrote:
>
>
> What is not completely clear to me now is how we will be able to have/make
> public implementations for linux implementation and potentially *Swan
> projects. It is a bit too early for now, but I am hoping to have a path in
> the
Hi Hannes,
One draft is esp, the other is ikev2, I tend to think it would be better to
have two separate documents.
Validation of specification SCHC will be supported by implementations and I
am aware of two ongoing implementations based on openschc. I am also aware
of 2 implementations that do
Shouldn't the two drafts be merged?
Who of the authors is going to implement the specs?
Ciao
Hannes
@Carsten: I have not been following the ROHC work after standardization
was completed. Was it actually used? Is it still used?
Am 30.11.2023 um 14:09 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
As a
