> On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:09 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
Substantive Comments:
-3, first paragraph:
Are people confident there will never, ever be a need to demux protocols
other than IKE and ESP? If not, this approach may paint people in a
corner in
Ben Campbell writes:
>
> > On Apr 26, 2017, at 6:06 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> >
> > Ben Campbell writes:
> >> --
> >> COMMENT:
> >> --
> >>
>
On Apr 26, 2017 16:23, "Tommy Pauly" wrote:
On Apr 26, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, Ben and Tommy,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Ben Campbell
> On Apr 26, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Ben and Tommy,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr
> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
> wrote:
>
> Hi, Ben and Tommy,
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>
> > On Apr 26, 2017, at 12:50 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> >
Hi, Ben and Tommy,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>
> > On Apr 26, 2017, at 12:50 PM, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > Thanks for the comments! Your point about the line in Section 6 not
> making sense is definitely a good
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the comments! Your point about the line in Section 6 not making
sense is definitely a good point. How about this text (changes in bold):
If a TCP connection is being used to resume a previous IKE session,
the TCP Responder can recognize the session using either the IKE SPI
By the way, the DISCUSS vs COMMENT framing has gotten lost from the thread.
Only the first point was part of the DISCUSS, the rest are non-binding
comments. And I think the DISCUSS point is moving in the right direction,
pending a text proposal.
Thanks!
Ben.
> On Apr 26, 2017, at 8:57 AM,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Kathleen Moriarty <
kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Kathleen Moriarty
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Kathleen Moriarty
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:38 PM,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Kathleen Moriarty <
kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> >
> >> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:38 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <
> kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for the
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>
>> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:38 PM, Kathleen Moriarty
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response Paul, a few questions...
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Paul Wouters
Ben Campbell writes:
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
> Substantive Comments:
>
> -3, first paragraph:
> Are people confident there will never, ever be a need to demux
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:38 PM, Kathleen Moriarty
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick response Paul, a few questions...
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
>>
IIUC, the
Hi Ben & others,
I may be able to help on a few of these, but the editors (etc.),
please correct me if necessary.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-09: Discuss
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo