Yes, this looks good! I think both RFCs in the columns makes sense. I agree
that this looks ready for WGLC.
Tommy
> On Jul 20, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
>> In the end I think the best option would be to just include
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Tero Kivinen wrote:
In the end I think the best option would be to just include both RFCs
in the references column, i.e. make the final table to be something
like this:
Number Name ESP Reference IKEv2 Reference
...
18 ENCR_AES_GCM_8
I submitted new version of the rfc4307bis draft, which includes
following changes:
Changed ENCR_AES_CBC from MUST- to MUST. The WG meeting was in favor
of doing this change, and if you are against this change, say so
now...
Added the IANA considerations section to rename the AES-GCM with an/a
x