Re: [IPsec] New version of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-10.txt

2016-07-20 Thread Tommy Pauly
Yes, this looks good! I think both RFCs in the columns makes sense. I agree that this looks ready for WGLC. Tommy > On Jul 20, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Tero Kivinen wrote: > >> In the end I think the best option would be to just include

Re: [IPsec] New version of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-10.txt

2016-07-20 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Tero Kivinen wrote: In the end I think the best option would be to just include both RFCs in the references column, i.e. make the final table to be something like this: Number Name ESP Reference IKEv2 Reference ... 18 ENCR_AES_GCM_8

[IPsec] New version of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-10.txt

2016-07-20 Thread Tero Kivinen
I submitted new version of the rfc4307bis draft, which includes following changes: Changed ENCR_AES_CBC from MUST- to MUST. The WG meeting was in favor of doing this change, and if you are against this change, say so now... Added the IANA considerations section to rename the AES-GCM with an/a x