On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:56:03AM +0200, Jens Link wrote:
> people can't/won't read headers. Most mail clients hide them pretty
> well. I guess that most people don't even konw they are there.
Correct, but appending footers is a problem with cryptographic
signatures, so a pretty much no-go too.
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:01:21AM +0200, Webmaster wrote:
> By the way ... I just realized that the list is not handling correctly
> DMARC users. So my own emails when they come back, go to the spam
> folder, which means they are going to the spam folder of many folks.
One could argue that this
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 09:29:45AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> If you’re receiving the messages is because YOU subscribed to the list.
Not necessarily. Especially with the big freemailers, email accounts
sometimes change owners... where old owner didn't unsub from all mailing
lists,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 05:51:37PM +, Goddess: Primal Chaos wrote:
> ### Do not reply below this line ###
>
> -
> Goddess: Primal Chaos | July 24, 2017 | 18:51 +0100
>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 01:50:07PM +0200, e.vanu...@avm.de wrote:
> CU at BBWF ;-) We are building CPE with IPv6 on board.
Which still can't even do static IPv6 routes or open firewall for
adresses in prefixes not directly connected.
Example: getting a /48 from upstream, either statically
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 09:45:51AM -0700, Brielle Bruns wrote:
When I posted on the list, I appear to have gotten this bounce from someone
subscribed here. Could one of the list mods please check this out?
This has been taken care of, thanks.
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:54:14AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
Blocking by /64 by default is likely to get collateral damage. Enough
people do shared subnets with multiple customers in the same /64 - while
I won't recommend it, it is *done*, and blocking the whole /64 because
you have seen
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 03:14:05PM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Every time I post to the list I get an email back from
i...@prizmaphoto.com. Could someone please check if that address is
subscribed to this list, and in that case, remove it?
Done.
Best regards,
Daniel (list admin)
--
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:41:30AM +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
Some cool news to start the day with:
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/TMobile-Goes-IPv6-Only-on-Android-44-Devices-126506
Just that IPv6 only is a bit misleading. IPv6-only on WAN interface,
but in fact it's dual-stack.
Anyway
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:55:05AM +0200, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
rantI presume that those who want ultimate privacy have inspected
their browsers to not do evercookies[1], removed any features in their
browsers identifying them via the fingerprint, and ensured that the
call-home feature of
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 03:14:52PM +0200, Martin Millnert wrote:
Anyway, the users will have to pay for that. Too bad users of !AAPL
have to subsidize those decisions. Time for an AAPL user NAT tax? :)
Interesting idea. Put AAPL-OUI's IPv4-traffic in lousy-queue in the
BNG? :}
Nah. The
Hi,
when using OpenVPN dualstack tunnels, I notice that Windows doesn't
realize that it has working IPv6 connectivity for a long time so it
won't use the newly established IPv6 connectivity until re-checking.
Is there any way to manually trigger Windows to re-check IPv6
connectivity?
Best
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-ops-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.cluenet.de
[mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.cluenet.de] On Behalf Of
Daniel Roesen
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 3:08 PM
To: ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de
Subject: Re: IPv6 contact for www.citrix.com - MTU
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:29:43AM +0200, Enno Rey wrote:
b) (much better): have the router advertise the lower MTU you want to use in
the RAs by just setting a lower MTU on the (router) interfaces in question.
See also:
Hi,
given that Christopher Palmer is on this list, I doubt NANOG ml would
be more helpful. CC'ing him for attention. :-)
Best regards,
Daniel
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:28:41AM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 30/04/2013 11:24, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
- Someone advertises records that
15 matches
Mail list logo
