RE: ipv6-ops Digest, Vol 159, Issue 1

2019-10-25 Thread Matthew Huff
This is part of one of the many reasons corporate acceptance of IPv6 is so low. The IPv6 design appears to be oriented toward residential, ISP, and public wifi usages, with little care to corporate needs. Not only is static IPs desired, but in many cases required by regulation (Auditing, access,

RE: Slow WiFi with Android Marshmallow & IPv6?

2016-04-24 Thread Matthew Huff
Remember, Android developers refuse to implement DHCPv6 and so can only get DNS server info from RDDNS (rfc6106). Since the number RA devices that support RFC6106 are limited, this provides another problem set for Android devices and IPv6 Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville

RE: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818

2014-08-23 Thread Matthew Huff
>From the blog: "I have no reason to believe that this will really happen. People are already sending mail over IPv6 and I expect that the same reputation mechanisms used for IPv4 will be deployed as soon as they will be needed, with small policy changes to cope with the fact that end users typ

RE: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818

2014-08-23 Thread Matthew Huff
Nick, I would expect the response will be silence. Since the current RBL methods are not currently operational with IPv6 due to design issues and that IPv4 reputation is a large part of anti-spam, there is a fundamental difference currently between the two protocols. As IPv6 smtp ramps up, I wou

RE: SMTP over IPv6 : gmail classifying nearly all IPv6 mail as spam since 20140818

2014-08-22 Thread Matthew Huff
Exchange SBS with broken isatap/6to4 tunnels causing mail to blackhole. These have been at small web based retailers which don't have hosted email. After the third incident, we yanked our IPv6 from our MX/gateways. Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations   | Pur

RE: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage

2014-02-14 Thread Matthew Huff
A) Using Ironport ESA (product) from Cisco (vendor), fully ipv6 enabled at edge. Internally, Exchange 2013 The only consistent smtp over IPv6 email we receive is from the nanog and this list. From: ipv6-ops-bounces+mhuff=ox@lists.cluenet.de [mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+mhuff=ox@list

RESOLVED: Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic

2013-06-28 Thread Matthew Huff
The issue was a CoPP filter on the ISP side. The session is up now. Been working on them with them for 3 days, and each engineer kept coming back to our BGP configuration. Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations   | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC

RE: [c-nsp] Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic

2013-06-28 Thread Matthew Huff
r come up if we can't get a TCP session established. Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 From: John Neiberger [mailto:jneiber...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 10:56 AM To: Ma

Weird IPv6 problem passing Layer3 traffic

2013-06-28 Thread Matthew Huff
0 0021.5903.1367 REACH Fa2/1 rtr-inet2#ping 2607:F518:15F::1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2607:F518:15F::1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms Matthew Huff 

RE: is gmail strongly penalizing IPv6 senders?

2013-05-30 Thread Matthew Huff
ErAdT w=; Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations   | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 > -Original Message- > From: ipv6-ops-bounces+mhuff=ox@lists.cluenet.de [mailto:ipv6-ops- > bounces+mhuff=ox@lists.