On 2014-11-11 16:00, Emanuel Popa wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyway to intentionally and immediately get on Google's DNS
blacklist in order to avoid similar outages in the future affecting
only IPv6 traffic?
http://www.google.com/intl/en_ALL/ipv6/statistics/data/no_.txt
Or maybe the smart
On 11/11/2014 15:00, Emanuel Popa wrote:
Is there anyway to intentionally and immediately get on Google's DNS
blacklist in order to avoid similar outages in the future affecting
only IPv6 traffic?
http://www.google.com/intl/en_ALL/ipv6/statistics/data/no_.txt
Or maybe the smart thing to
On 2014-11-11 19:09, Andras Toth wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Jeroen Massar jer...@massar.ch
mailto:jer...@massar.ch wrote:
If you expect that they have outages that they cannot quickly see or
not, then you should also expect a blacklist like to be broken or not
Hi Lorenzo,
Op 9 nov. 2014, om 22:10 heeft Lorenzo Colitti lore...@google.com het
volgende geschreven:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jeroen Massar jer...@massar.ch wrote:
The issue with IPv6 access to Google should now be resolved. Please let
us know if you're still having problems.
Hi Philipp,
Op 10 nov. 2014 om 21:09 heeft Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org het volgende
geschreven:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 07:36:22PM +0100, Sander Steffann wrote:
I guess most users wouldn't really notice a 1-RTT delay.
Depends on the RTT. In mobile networks it generally sucks.
Good
Hi,
I've been having terrible connectivity to Google via IPv6 the last few
days (i'd even resorted to using Bing!), but can confirm it is working
fine for me today.
Thanks,
Dan.
On 09/11/2014 06:26, Joe Hamelin wrote:
Google did have some issues, look at the outage list. They are
On 2014-11-09 10:42, Daniel Austin wrote:
Hi,
I've been having terrible connectivity to Google via IPv6 the last few
days (i'd even resorted to using Bing!), but can confirm it is working
fine for me today.
It indeed is looking fine now for the Google problem. Now for Akamai to
use their
* Jeroen Massar
On 2014-11-08 18:38, Tore Anderson wrote:
Yannis: «We're enabling IPv6 on our CPEs»
Jeroen: «And then getting broken connectivity to Google»
I'm not a native speaker of English, but I struggle to understand it
any other way than you're saying there's something broken
* Nick Hilliard
On 09/11/2014 11:00, Tore Anderson wrote:
Only if Google and Akamai are universally broken, which does not
seem to have been the case. I tested Google from the RING at 23:20
UTC yesterday:
did you do a control run on a known working site?
No. I feel that 250+ successes
On 2014-11-09 12:00, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jeroen Massar
On 2014-11-08 18:38, Tore Anderson wrote:
Yannis: «We're enabling IPv6 on our CPEs»
Jeroen: «And then getting broken connectivity to Google»
I'm not a native speaker of English, but I struggle to understand it
any other way than
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:03:01PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
No. I feel that 250+ successes vs 10 failures is enough to conclude
that Akamai and Google are *not* universally broken, far from it.
Testing from colod boxes on well behaved networks (otherwise they would
not know or be part
* Jeroen Massar
Testing from colod boxes on well behaved networks (otherwise they
would not know or be part of the RING), while the problem lies with
actual home users is quite a difference.
So far you've been claiming that the problem lies with Google or
Akamai. If true - and I don't dispute
On 11/9/14 12:27 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
So far you've been claiming that the problem lies with Google or
Akamai. If true - and I don't dispute that it is - then testing from
the RING should work just as well as from any home network.
No, that's not true at all. Eyeball networks have very
On 2014-11-09 22:10, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Jeroen Massar jer...@massar.ch
mailto:jer...@massar.ch wrote:
The issue with IPv6 access to Google should now be resolved. Please
let
us know if you're still having problems.
The fun question of
On 2014-11-09 21:27, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jeroen Massar
Testing from colod boxes on well behaved networks (otherwise they
would not know or be part of the RING), while the problem lies with
actual home users is quite a difference.
So far you've been claiming that the problem lies with
On 2014-11-09 22:10, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jeroen Massar
Also note that the Akamai problem (which still persists) is a random
one. Hence fetching one URL is just a pure luck thing if it works or
not. As a generic page has multiple objects though, you'll hit it much
quicker.
Hm. As I've
I'm not a native speaker of English, but I struggle to understand it
any other way than you're saying there's something broken about
Yannis' deployment. I mean, your reply wasn't even a standalone
statement, but a continuation of Yannis' sentence. :-P
That statement is correct though.
hey,
I'm afraid I don't see the supporting evidence here. From my point
of view, Google and Akamai IPv6 both work just fine.
Concur. Both work just fine from my POV and I don't see lower than usual
IPv6 traffic levels.
--
tarko
Google did have some issues, look at the outage list. They are resolved
now:
Damian Menscher dam...@google.com
6:44 PM (3 hours ago)
The issue with IPv6 access to Google should now be resolved. Please let us
know if you're still having problems.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA,
19 matches
Mail list logo
