I wouldn't say that it is dependent in the RIR, it is about an ISP
decision, not about a regional organization. (note, I work for one).
It may be some bias from some organizations or individuals in those
regions, but at the end the decision of using /64, /60, /56 or /48
depends
It was a disclaimer only.
.as
On 8/20/13 11:36 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2013-08-20 16:33 , Arturo Servin wrote:
I wouldn't say that it is dependent in the RIR, it is about an ISP
decision, not about a regional organization. (note, I work for one).
Working for a RIR just
So it seems that we agree.
.as
On 8/20/13 11:36 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
It may be some bias from some organizations or individuals in those
regions, but at the end the decision of using /64, /60, /56 or /48
depends on the ISP alone.
As prefixes are allocated based on the
,
Don't put any global scope addresses on it at all.
Ole
On 1 Jun 2013, at 22:24, Arturo Servin arturo.ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Got it.
I though it was something different.
Suppose now that I am very stubborn and I do not want to configure
/128, /127, /126, /112, /96 or any other
Yes, we did.
1.8% today I guess, far away to the second place in LAC with just
0.03-0.04%.
Regards,
as
On 5/21/13 10:43 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
In the same vein, did you notice Peru? Still 'low' at 1% but climbing
linearly since early 2013 :)
-Original
