Re: [Ironruby-core] progress on ironrubymvc :)

2009-02-01 Thread Ivan Porto Carrero
I just checked in a somewhat working implementation of asp.net mvc and IronRuby. It is also much faster than I expected. There is no support for filters and the likes yet but you should be able to define controllers. It should also be able to recognize controller actions and controller files by

[Ironruby-core] progress on ironrubymvc :)

2009-01-30 Thread Ivan Porto Carrero
Hi I think I can have a very basic version of ironruby mvc going over the weekend.. that will probably be without support for things like filters etc. yet.. but you should be able to define a controller and actions in ironruby. I haven't looked at the view engine yet and I'm unclear as to which

Re: [Ironruby-core] progress on ironrubymvc :)

2009-01-30 Thread Thibaut Barrère
Hi Ivan, will you share this on github ? That's something I will try using at some point. cheers, Thibaut On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Ivan Porto Carrero i...@flanders.co.nz wrote: Hi I think I can have a very basic version of ironruby mvc going over the weekend.. that will probably

Re: [Ironruby-core] progress on ironrubymvc :)

2009-01-30 Thread Curt Hagenlocher
Of Ivan Porto Carrero Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:18 AM To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org Subject: [Ironruby-core] progress on ironrubymvc :) snip Also there is a conflict between 2 types in the System namespace. System.Func is defined in 2 places. I aliased the System.Core assembly and am

Re: [Ironruby-core] progress on ironrubymvc :)

2009-01-30 Thread Ivan Porto Carrero
Yep I forked your project. I don't have it running yet.. and i did get the source code of the asp.net mvc RC1. Indeed my first goal was to take it to the state it was before.. i think that is the most basic implementation possible. When that works I did want to flesh it out so that it knows how to