[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vladimir Sitnikov updated CALCITE-3778:
---
Summary: Include downstream SQL in EXPLAIN output (was: Provide ways to
view the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17035126#comment-17035126
]
Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-3778:
Calcite's explain should include downstream
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vladimir Sitnikov updated CALCITE-3778:
---
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Wish)
> Provide ways to view the physical SQLs sent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vladimir Sitnikov reopened CALCITE-3778:
> Provide ways to view the physical SQLs sent to database
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17035104#comment-17035104
]
Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-2442:
Gradle itself does not use {{.toDelete}} file,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
jerryleooo closed CALCITE-3778.
---
Resolution: Fixed
[~zabetak] thanks so much! Closing this issue to stop making the mail group
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17035034#comment-17035034
]
Ravi Kapoor edited comment on CALCITE-3784 at 2/12/20 4:22 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17035034#comment-17035034
]
Ravi Kapoor commented on CALCITE-3784:
--
[~julianhyde] [~hyuan] It seems shocking to me as well
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ravi Kapoor updated CALCITE-3784:
-
Attachment: OOM Screenshot.png
> RexCall toString digest gives OOM while huge expression is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17035027#comment-17035027
]
Feng Zhu commented on CALCITE-3224:
---
This patch does not cover the 64kb problem. But the new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17035023#comment-17035023
]
Danny Chen commented on CALCITE-3224:
-
Can this patch solve the problem for generating methods with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17035019#comment-17035019
]
Danny Chen commented on CALCITE-3761:
-
I mean for the intermediate operands, can you use the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17035012#comment-17035012
]
Feng Zhu edited comment on CALCITE-2442 at 2/12/20 3:11 AM:
Unfortunately,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17035012#comment-17035012
]
Feng Zhu commented on CALCITE-2442:
---
Unfortunately, it does not work. I guess the file might be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17035003#comment-17035003
]
Chunwei Lei commented on CALCITE-3192:
--
Thanks [~julianhyde], [~hyuan]. What [~hyuan] said is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Danny Chen resolved CALCITE-3781.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034967#comment-17034967
]
Danny Chen commented on CALCITE-3769:
-
[~vladimirsitnikov] Do you have any other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Danny Chen updated CALCITE-3769:
Description:
The TableScanRule is the only planner rule that for a logical node(e.g. the
table
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034947#comment-17034947
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3784:
--
One thing we can do is not create left-deep expressions.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Hyde resolved CALCITE-3713.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Marking fixed, because it is fixed.
Please create a new issue. Copy in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated CALCITE-3785:
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> HepPlanner.belongToDag() doesn't have to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiening Dai reopened CALCITE-3713:
--
The fix incurs performance overhead when using mapDigestToVertex,
mapDigestToRel, since now the
Xiening Dai created CALCITE-3785:
Summary: HepPlanner.belongToDag() doesn't have to use
mapDigestToVertex
Key: CALCITE-3785
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3785
Project: Calcite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034898#comment-17034898
]
Andrei Sereda commented on CALCITE-2442:
[~donnyzone] Can you pls try
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034864#comment-17034864
]
Haisheng Yuan commented on CALCITE-3784:
Anyway, with current architecture, I don't think there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034842#comment-17034842
]
Haisheng Yuan commented on CALCITE-3784:
A filter condition with 10,000 expressions, would use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034815#comment-17034815
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3784:
--
OK, I agree. If we have many copies of each expression,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034748#comment-17034748
]
Haisheng Yuan commented on CALCITE-3192:
If I understand it correctly, [~Chunwei Lei] is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034725#comment-17034725
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3192:
--
I'd do a truth table of a = (null, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) and b =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034717#comment-17034717
]
Haisheng Yuan edited comment on CALCITE-3784 at 2/11/20 6:53 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034717#comment-17034717
]
Haisheng Yuan commented on CALCITE-3784:
[~julianhyde] It is not surprising large rexcalls
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034689#comment-17034689
]
Haisheng Yuan commented on CALCITE-3784:
unfortunately, the current design of Calcite can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Hyde updated CALCITE-3784:
-
Description:
I have some complex query which has tens of thousands of rex expressions and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034683#comment-17034683
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3784:
--
First thing you should do is consider whether you need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Hyde updated CALCITE-3784:
-
Description:
I have some complex query which has tens of thousands of rex expressions and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034652#comment-17034652
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3783:
--
+1
The JIRA summary and commit message are a bit out of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated CALCITE-3783:
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> PruneEmptyRules#JOIN_RIGHT_INSTANCE wrong
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-3783:
---
Affects Version/s: 1.21.0
> PruneEmptyRules#JOIN_RIGHT_INSTANCE wrong behavior for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17034463#comment-17034463
]
Chunwei Lei commented on CALCITE-3192:
--
Thank you for your clarification. What I am confused with
Ravi Kapoor created CALCITE-3784:
Summary: RexCall toString digest gives OOM while huge expression
is evaluated
Key: CALCITE-3784
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3784
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-3783:
---
Description:
The rule PruneEmptyRules#JOIN_RIGHT_INSTANCE "_converts a Join to empty if its
right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-3783:
---
Description:
{{PruneEmptyRules#JOIN_RIGHT_INSTANCE}} "_converts a Join to empty if its right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-3783:
---
Description:
The rule PruneEmptyRules#JOIN_RIGHT_INSTANCE "_converts a Join to empty if its
right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-3783:
---
Summary: PruneEmptyRules#JOIN_RIGHT_INSTANCE wrong behavior for
JoinRelType.ANTI (was: Rule to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-3783:
---
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
> Rule to remove Join on top of empty Values
>
Ruben Q L created CALCITE-3783:
--
Summary: Rule to remove Join on top of empty Values
Key: CALCITE-3783
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3783
Project: Calcite
Issue Type:
hailong wang created CALCITE-3782:
-
Summary: Bitwise operator Bit_And, Bit_OR and Bit_XOR support
binary and varbinary type
Key: CALCITE-3782
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3782
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated CALCITE-3779:
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Implement BITAND scalar function
>
48 matches
Mail list logo