[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1321) In-list to join optimization should have configurable in-list size

2016-07-25 Thread Gautam Kumar Parai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15392770#comment-15392770 ] Gautam Kumar Parai commented on CALCITE-1321: - [~jni] [~julianhyde] Thanks so much for the

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1321) In-list to join optimization should have configurable in-list size

2016-07-22 Thread Jinfeng Ni (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15390060#comment-15390060 ] Jinfeng Ni commented on CALCITE-1321: - [~julianhyde], not sure if you prefer a planner rule, or

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1321) In-list to join optimization should have configurable in-list size

2016-07-21 Thread Gautam Kumar Parai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15387218#comment-15387218 ] Gautam Kumar Parai commented on CALCITE-1321: - I have updated the pull request

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1321) In-list to join optimization should have configurable in-list size

2016-07-20 Thread Julian Hyde (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15386484#comment-15386484 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1321: -- Until CALCITE-816, using a rule was not feasible, because

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-1321) In-list to join optimization should have configurable in-list size

2016-07-20 Thread Julian Hyde (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15386386#comment-15386386 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1321: -- First reaction to the PR: that's a lot of code. Is there a