[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3340) Make TUMBLE be accepted as an operand for COLLECTION_TABLE(TABLE syntax) in validator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16930845#comment-16930845 ] Rui Wang commented on CALCITE-3340: --- I see. Thanks for bringing it up. To clarify, I am aiming to

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3340) Make TUMBLE be accepted as an operand for COLLECTION_TABLE(TABLE syntax) in validator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16930838#comment-16930838 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3340: -- I don't really understand any of this case. Let's start

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3340) Make TUMBLE be accepted as an operand for COLLECTION_TABLE(TABLE syntax) in validator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16930789#comment-16930789 ] Rui Wang commented on CALCITE-3340: --- "TUMBLE_TABLE_FUNCTION" was a quick decision to skip some

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3340) Make TUMBLE be accepted as an operand for COLLECTION_TABLE(TABLE syntax) in validator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16930758#comment-16930758 ] Rui Wang commented on CALCITE-3340: --- [~julianhyde] Could you please give some feedback on this

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3340) Make TUMBLE be accepted as an operand for COLLECTION_TABLE(TABLE syntax) in validator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16929597#comment-16929597 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3340: -- I think you need new TUMBLE and HOP functions. Is it

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3340) Make TUMBLE be accepted as an operand for COLLECTION_TABLE(TABLE syntax) in validator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16929003#comment-16929003 ] Rui Wang commented on CALCITE-3340: --- I was finally able to create the following plan: {code:java}

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3340) Make TUMBLE be accepted as an operand for COLLECTION_TABLE(TABLE syntax) in validator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16928911#comment-16928911 ] Rui Wang commented on CALCITE-3340: --- Actually by the idea above(with a slight modification), I was

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3340) Make TUMBLE be accepted as an operand for COLLECTION_TABLE(TABLE syntax) in validator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16928836#comment-16928836 ] Rui Wang commented on CALCITE-3340: --- This is a pretty important moment so I will confirm more

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3340) Make TUMBLE be accepted as an operand for COLLECTION_TABLE(TABLE syntax) in validator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16928595#comment-16928595 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3340: -- It seems that {{TUMBLE}} should be a built-in table

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3340) Make TUMBLE be accepted as an operand for COLLECTION_TABLE(TABLE syntax) in validator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16928130#comment-16928130 ] Rui Wang commented on CALCITE-3340: --- By treating TUMBLE the same as OTHER_FUNCTION during