Github user TestSuiteReductionResearch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/171
Thank you again for providing more feedback. I believe our analysis did
find some other tests that do seem to be covering the same scenarios, and we
will be sending them as s
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/171
@august782, thanks for being understanding. I think finding redundant
tests, and simplifying it is a good idea, just not in the case of tests
covering many different scenarios.
I think m
Github user TestSuiteReductionResearch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/171
Thank you very much for the feedback! It does make sense that you want to
keep tests for different scenarios even if they do have the same coverage.
Besides these two
Github user august782 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/171
Thank you very much for the feedback! It does make sense that you want to
keep tests for different scenarios even if they do have the same coverage.
Besides these two tests, our analy
Github user garydgregory commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/171
I agree, -1 to remove the test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/171
Both tests use ClassUtils#wrapperToPrimitive. One passes a String.class,
and the other a null value. Then the method looks at a map, created and filled
in a static constructor.
Since St
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/171
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/7027718)
Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 93.468% when pulling
**ed27ea4132fbe36d0aec80
