[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627695#comment-14627695
]
William Saar commented on FLINK-2355:
-
No Co* tasks. Here is the plan
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/677#issuecomment-121533840
+1 good to merge and this is a prerequisite for getting a first version of
the new web UI in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627734#comment-14627734
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-297:
--
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
Github user ggevay commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/911#issuecomment-121535037
Ok, of looks better indeed. I will modify it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627778#comment-14627778
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1967:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/906#issuecomment-121547033
As far as I understand, the current mechanism (operator time) is still
possible. Then it would be okay.
Concerning always adding timestamps to stream
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/913#discussion_r34661467
--- Diff: docs/internals/through_stack.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+---
+title: From Program to Result: A Dive through Stack and Execution
+---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627792#comment-14627792
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2363:
---
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627799#comment-14627799
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2363:
---
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/913#discussion_r34661865
--- Diff: docs/internals/through_stack.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+---
+title: From Program to Result: A Dive through Stack and Execution
+---
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/913#discussion_r34661812
--- Diff: docs/internals/through_stack.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+---
+title: From Program to Result: A Dive through Stack and Execution
+---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627713#comment-14627713
]
Ufuk Celebi commented on FLINK-2355:
Thanks for the plan. I had a look at it with
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/906#issuecomment-121533017
Would anyone like to look into the implementation? I think if we want to
have this feature we should merge this rather sooner than later because it
touches a lot of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627729#comment-14627729
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1967:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627743#comment-14627743
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2359:
---
Github user ggevay commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627775#comment-14627775
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1967:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/906#issuecomment-121546219
I think the implementation looks good however I am concerned about the
performance hit.
We need to make sure that we dont get this serious overhead when the job
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627787#comment-14627787
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1967:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/906#issuecomment-121548970
If we can still have the records without timestamps that would be good. But
this should be automatic.
Regarding monitoring, this seems to be an overkill for that
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/913#discussion_r34661712
--- Diff: docs/internals/through_stack.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+---
+title: From Program to Result: A Dive through Stack and Execution
+---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627737#comment-14627737
]
William Saar commented on FLINK-2355:
-
Thanks, just wanted to check if this was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627807#comment-14627807
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2292:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/913#issuecomment-121559138
The text for the task manager execution looks good except for some minor
things. I did not check the SVG.
If you want to put it out like that (incomplete
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/906#issuecomment-121558994
I was just trying to make the point that for monitoring we don't need to
attach timestamps for all the records. If monitoring means 15% less throughput
I would probably
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627813#comment-14627813
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1967:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/896#discussion_r34662511
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/TaskManager.scala
---
@@ -306,99 +308,100 @@ extends Actor with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627811#comment-14627811
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2292:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627816#comment-14627816
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2363:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627820#comment-14627820
]
William Saar commented on FLINK-2355:
-
At the very end I am splitting the input into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627823#comment-14627823
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2292:
---
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/896#discussion_r34662919
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/TaskManager.scala
---
@@ -306,99 +308,100 @@ extends Actor with ActorLogMessages with
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/906#issuecomment-121559974
Yeah, we can add a way to not have timestamps. But my feeling is that this
is pre-mature optimization.
The point where this is really relevant is when people
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627824#comment-14627824
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1967:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/911#issuecomment-121560503
PR looks good to me except for the purely reformatting changes which should
be excluded from the PR.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/896#discussion_r34663165
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/TaskManager.scala
---
@@ -306,99 +308,100 @@ extends Actor with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627825#comment-14627825
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2359:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627826#comment-14627826
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2292:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/913#issuecomment-121562249
Thanks for the checks. So many typos ;-)
I opened this pull request as WIP and would encourage other committers to
jump in. I have been doing miles of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627830#comment-14627830
]
Ufuk Celebi commented on FLINK-2355:
Would you like to do a more interactive debugging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627831#comment-14627831
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2363:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627837#comment-14627837
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2363:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the pull
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/913#issuecomment-121563616
I see, thanks for the effort!
I'll take care of the *Batch API: DataSets to JobGraph* section.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user mjsax commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/750#issuecomment-121534709
@StephanEwen Any news on this PR? It applies some changes to JobManager
WebFrontend. Would be great, if this could be merged before #677 and/or #297
---
If your project
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/911#issuecomment-121534658
Thanks for adding the generator methods. That's definitely more convenient
than using `new`. I also prefer `of` instead of `create`.
---
If your project is set up for it,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627742#comment-14627742
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2111:
---
Github user mjsax commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627741#comment-14627741
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2359:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627750#comment-14627750
]
Ufuk Celebi commented on FLINK-2355:
OK. There can be an issue if you are not
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/912#issuecomment-121535828
Thanks @chenliag613 for the pull request!
I agree with @chiwanpark. If you're behind a proxy then you probably
already know how to work with it. There are also other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627763#comment-14627763
]
Andra Lungu commented on FLINK-2299:
That's what I was chatting with Fabian about this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627773#comment-14627773
]
Vasia Kalavri commented on FLINK-2361:
--
Hey,
I have seen this exception before and I
Stephan Ewen created FLINK-2363:
---
Summary: Add an end-to-end overview of program execution in Flink
to the docs
Key: FLINK-2363
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2363
Project: Flink
GitHub user StephanEwen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/913
[FLINK-2363] [docs] First part of internals - complete job execution
overview
I found that many people do not understand the model behind Flink.
I started drafting/outlining a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627783#comment-14627783
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2363:
---
GitHub user StephanEwen opened a pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627800#comment-14627800
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2363:
---
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/913#discussion_r34662306
--- Diff: docs/internals/through_stack.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+---
+title: From Program to Result: A Dive through Stack and Execution
+---
Github user StephanEwen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/896#discussion_r34662347
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/accumulators/AccumulatorRegistry.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627805#comment-14627805
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2363:
---
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/906#issuecomment-121557154
I could add a mode where the sources don't attach timestamps and where the
StreamRecordSerializer ignores the timestamps and does not multiplex Records
and Watermarks.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627804#comment-14627804
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1967:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627759#comment-14627759
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2361:
-
From past error reports about operator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627795#comment-14627795
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2363:
---
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627601#comment-14627601
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2359:
---
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/911#issuecomment-121503903
I also prefer `of` as a method name.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/912#issuecomment-121515483
Hi, Thanks for your contribution. But I think this PR is not necessary
because the change is not specific to Flink but about the general of git.
---
If your project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627622#comment-14627622
]
Andra Lungu commented on FLINK-2361:
Sure,
This is the main class:
GitHub user chenliag613 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/912
Update README.md
add script for setting network proxy for git clone to connect network.
Currently many company's network need use proxy, the script is useful for
new users.
You can merge
Suminda Dharmasena created FLINK-2364:
-
Summary: Link to Guide is Broken
Key: FLINK-2364
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2364
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/896#discussion_r34665546
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/TaskManager.scala
---
@@ -306,99 +308,100 @@ extends Actor with ActorLogMessages with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627862#comment-14627862
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2292:
---
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/910#issuecomment-121592253
I am wondering about two things, maybe I didnt catch something as I was
just scrolling through:
-Why the output of the distinct methods are not DataStreamLong
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/906#issuecomment-121592265
I added numbers to my google sheet
(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mXcy25UOiZ4lEJOia1OM-K-U6np2bWv3x4q5nSnUMdg/edit?usp=sharing)
that show the performance with
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/896#discussion_r34674005
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/accumulators/AccumulatorRegistry.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627996#comment-14627996
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2131:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
GitHub user mxm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/914
[taskmanager] do not process message if not connected to job manager
When a message is received on the task manager, it should not be processed
when not connected to the job manager. At least that is
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/914#issuecomment-121605225
Makes sense, +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/757#issuecomment-121605233
@thvasilo I've incorporated different initialization strategies in the
KMeans algorithm itself. Please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627997#comment-14627997
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2292:
---
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/757#issuecomment-121713405
Hello Sachin,
I'm currently on vacation until August so someone else needs to so the
reviews until then.
Regards,
Theodore
--
Sent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14628562#comment-14628562
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1943:
---
GitHub user vasia opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14628551#comment-14628551
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2131:
---
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14628581#comment-14628581
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1967:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/906#issuecomment-121720966
No worries, that's why we have the process. :smiley_cat:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14628555#comment-14628555
]
Enrique Bautista Barahona commented on FLINK-2300:
--
[~mxm], I've thought
GitHub user vasia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/916
[FLINK-1943] [gelly] Added GSA compiler and translation tests
Thanks @StephanEwen for the help!
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/906#issuecomment-121693041
Thats great, thanks Aljoscha. Sorry for raising so many concerns. I just
want to make sure this change will be smooth :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14628364#comment-14628364
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1967:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/906#issuecomment-121681480
I now added a switch that disables timestamps and watermark multiplexing.
Timestamps and multiplexing are disabled by default, i.e. the performance of
existing stuff is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14628455#comment-14628455
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1967:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14628651#comment-14628651
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2148:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/910#issuecomment-121733115
This is an interesting issue, exactly because of the current API for
aggregations. I think the main purpose of returning the aggregated values
inside the original data is
Github user pp86 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/905#issuecomment-121739943
Dear @fhueske ,
I hope I satisfied your requests! Let me know if some other changes are
needed.
As you suggested I took the issue on documentation.
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/910#issuecomment-121733294
By the way, don't the maps need to have parallelism 1 to function properly?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14628652#comment-14628652
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2148:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14628689#comment-14628689
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1963:
---
Github user pp86 commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14628934#comment-14628934
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1963:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the pull
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/905#issuecomment-121775689
Looks good to me, thanks!
Will try the changes tomorrow and merge.
Thanks for helping with the documentation!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Enrique Bautista Barahona created FLINK-2365:
Summary: Review of How to contribute page
Key: FLINK-2365
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2365
Project: Flink
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627941#comment-14627941
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2148:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627942#comment-14627942
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1967:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14627983#comment-14627983
]
Rohit Shinde commented on FLINK-1748:
-
I would like to have this issue assigned to me.
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo