[GitHub] flink issue #2605: [DISCUSS] Introduce config options

2016-10-07 Thread StephanEwen
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2605 I like Greg's idea - will make it more readable. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] flink issue #2605: [DISCUSS] Introduce config options

2016-10-07 Thread uce
Github user uce commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2605 Looks very good! +1 to do this. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] flink issue #2605: [DISCUSS] Introduce config options

2016-10-06 Thread greghogan
Github user greghogan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2605 +1. My only suggestion would be to move the deprecated keys out of the constructor into a separate method like `public Option withDeprecatedKeys(String... deprecatedKeys) {`. And the same