[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13171035#comment-13171035
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5051:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13171127#comment-13171127
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5053:
I will update the patch. For the new log line, it can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13171153#comment-13171153
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5053:
v2 with Ted's comment taken into account (including error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13171238#comment-13171238
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5053:
TestInstantSchemaChange = Too many open files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13171240#comment-13171240
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5053:
@ted, ok, so I don't press submit patch then :-)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13171256#comment-13171256
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5051:
my error. sorry. will look after this.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170165#comment-13170165
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5027:
Patch submitted with the implementation proposed by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170280#comment-13170280
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5027:
Too many open files
We're using quite a lot of threads
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170342#comment-13170342
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5027:
Yes, I removed the retry counter because the clone is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170347#comment-13170347
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5027:
The cheap clone was already committed by Ted in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170348#comment-13170348
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5027:
Yes, i will work
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:00 PM, stack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13170350#comment-13170350
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5027:
't' is missing in my last comment = yes, just apply this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13169186#comment-13169186
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4993:
HBase#Configuration is expensive by nature, see the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13169328#comment-13169328
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5022:
usual Too many open files
It just proves that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13169526#comment-13169526
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4993:
@ted, stack;
Can be committed imho, it seems we all agree
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13169572#comment-13169572
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4993:
It not really related to the patch, but to TestAdmin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13169585#comment-13169585
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4993:
Test done:
- it's much much faster if we remove the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13169590#comment-13169590
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5027:
In hbase-5022, I replaced the reload implementation with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13169682#comment-13169682
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5027:
Yes, I executed it alone. On 5 times, it fails 1.
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13169693#comment-13169693
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5027:
It it possible to count the number of connection open?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13169715#comment-13169715
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5027:
Ok, I will do that and change the test then.
On Wed, Dec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13168564#comment-13168564
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-5015:
No, it's an helper function to use locally the debugging.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13168676#comment-13168676
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4993:
I've retested it. Executed 5 times here, worked 4 times,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13167479#comment-13167479
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
It still blocks sometimes on your computer? I haven't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13167665#comment-13167665
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
I propose 1024, as it's the current limit on hadoop-qa.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13166809#comment-13166809
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
All tests ok locally, including:
{noformat}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13166834#comment-13166834
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
Second local execution ok as well.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13165919#comment-13165919
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
When I submitted the patch, yes, all of them, large
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13166048#comment-13166048
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4610:
There is a side effect: the mini cluster needs 4,5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13166343#comment-13166343
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4610:
I will fix this in HBASE-4993
Port
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13166728#comment-13166728
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
Thank you very much stack for the v2.Hadoop-QA seems ok.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13165246#comment-13165246
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4973:
I believe it can be committed.
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13165247#comment-13165247
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
I summarize the main infos:
- it seems that hadoop-qa is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13164396#comment-13164396
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
First, Hadoop QA seems to be configured with 1024 file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13164401#comment-13164401
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
The error seems unrelated to my patch. It the same error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13164416#comment-13164416
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4971:
These 3 tests are not impacted by my change. They're
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13164427#comment-13164427
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
Here are the possible leaks. I am gonna fix some of them
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13164430#comment-13164430
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-2675:
'mvn test -P runSmallTests' runs about 400 tests out the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13164583#comment-13164583
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4974:
The 3 tests fails on trunk as well. However, it means
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13163937#comment-13163937
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
Oops. Sorry.
Here they are.
To use then, we need to add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13163966#comment-13163966
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4965:
It's one rule for each test class.
With a fixed surefire,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13163089#comment-13163089
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4847:
@stack
It's documented in hbase-4712
{noformat}
1.3)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13162328#comment-13162328
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4847:
We're leaking threads in the tests actually. It seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13162340#comment-13162340
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4847:
I think it's ok for commit.
Time to execute 917 tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13162099#comment-13162099
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4847:
v10 contains a real fix on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13162184#comment-13162184
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4847:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13161498#comment-13161498
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4712:
bq. Is that one report each for the medium and large or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13161499#comment-13161499
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4712:
updated version after Jesse's comments:
--
1) Running
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13161883#comment-13161883
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4847:
All the stuff unable to create new native thread is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13160899#comment-13160899
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4847:
Well, as with this patch all small tests are executed in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13160917#comment-13160917
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4847:
{noformat}unable to create new native thread{noformat}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13160211#comment-13160211
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4712:
Updated version. I suppose there is a tool to put that in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13158608#comment-13158608
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4712:
Udpated doc, taking into account the possibility to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13158015#comment-13158015
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4847:
Seems that the machine was not in its best state:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13157476#comment-13157476
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4832:
I believe this patch could be integrated?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13157478#comment-13157478
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4833:
The v2 is for the new trunk, can be integrated after or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13157519#comment-13157519
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4763:
I believe the integration is successful, we now have to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155815#comment-13155815
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4519:
Fixed in HBASE-4798. We now set a timeout for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154933#comment-13154933
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4832:
One little comment: there is a conflict between the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155067#comment-13155067
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4825:
Can be committed. There is zookeeper.TestZooKeeperACL as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13155570#comment-13155570
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4832:
fyi, the patch for the region server itself is in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154129#comment-13154129
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4833:
I created HBASE-4832 to follow the fix on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13153494#comment-13153494
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4763:
@stack: yes, but Gary has actually created a special repo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13153517#comment-13153517
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4781:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestAdmin: Caused by:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13153518#comment-13153518
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
Intersection of the two tests and of trunk failures is:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13153539#comment-13153539
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4712:
New proposal:
1) Running tests
HBase tests are divided
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13153561#comment-13153561
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4826:
local tests ok, can't be tested on pre-integration (it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13152803#comment-13152803
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4763:
Fix for surefire 793. I've been able to reduce the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13152857#comment-13152857
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
v5 contains everything except HRegionServer#stop: use a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13153085#comment-13153085
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
These ones are likely to be in the flaky zone, but I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151953#comment-13151953
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
For TestCatalogTrackerOnCluster I've got it working. It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151996#comment-13151996
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
Ok, I've got it for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13152052#comment-13152052
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4781:
Surefire issue, exists already on the previous version (=
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13152355#comment-13152355
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4763:
We're going to need SUREFIRE-793 (JUnit47 provider
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151107#comment-13151107
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4763:
Note that:I found a new bug in surefire, and fixed it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151146#comment-13151146
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
@commiters: for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151239#comment-13151239
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
@commiters: For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151566#comment-13151566
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4763:
Surefire revision for SUREFIRE-791 SUREFIRE-785:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151586#comment-13151586
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4763:
Yes, I am working with him, he's building surefire junit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151634#comment-13151634
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
I will add the spaces.
sleeper.sleep() does not sleep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151638#comment-13151638
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
(comment continued) actually Ted mentioned me an error he
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151650#comment-13151650
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
This said, when I look at the traces, it seems that it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151700#comment-13151700
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
bq. That is, not in the for() loop below that. Does that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13151744#comment-13151744
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4798:
Don't spend too much of your time on it, i will do the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150369#comment-13150369
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4764:
It worked on integration? Should I do something?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150518#comment-13150518
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4326:
I checked the status for the tests mentionned:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150520#comment-13150520
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4326:
note: check done on trunk, not .90
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13149860#comment-13149860
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4780:
Yep, I re run the tests to be sure.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13149924#comment-13149924
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4764:
It's just a renaming of a class that impacted only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13149928#comment-13149928
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4764:
@ted: If the process is still alive, can you jstack it?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150001#comment-13150001
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4764:
For example, after a look at the code where the above
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13150041#comment-13150041
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4764:
Ok, may be we can handle this with a post build task that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13149099#comment-13149099
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4764:
@committers: please tell if you're ok with:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13148621#comment-13148621
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4763:
Ok, I have it working on my env now. Still testing, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13147206#comment-13147206
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4737:
Hi,
I am fighting with surefire (and it's a difficult
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13146689#comment-13146689
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4737:
@commiters: are you ok with the patch? The pom has been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13146710#comment-13146710
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4737:
Yes, I used Jenkins time to do the split. But there are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13144965#comment-13144965
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4737:
@Mikael Thank you for the zookeeper patch.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13145275#comment-13145275
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4737:
the -1 on @author is a bug in the validation tool: I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13144626#comment-13144626
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-4737:
bq. The failed tests from other groups weren't included
101 - 200 of 236 matches
Mail list logo